Dillard v. Lovell et al
Filing
7
ORDER. To date, the Court has not received an amended complaint or any request to extend the deadline for filing one. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to mail this recommendation to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/5/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF cc Recommendation mailed to Plaintiff - CAH)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
7
8
9
***
James H. Dillard II,
Case No. 2:23-cv-01242-CDS-DJA
Plaintiff,
Order
v.
Damon Lovell, Marquis Edwards, and Kenneth
Rucker,
10
Defendants.
11
12
The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and
13
screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 3). In doing so, the Court found
14
that Plaintiff’s complaint was deficient. (Id.). As a result, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s
15
complaint on October 27, 2023 and granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint, requiring that
16
an amended complaint be filed within 30 days, which has since passed. (Id.). The Court stated,
17
“[f]ailure to comply with this order will result in the recommended dismissal of this case.” (Id. at
18
4). To date, the Court has not received an amended complaint or any request to extend the
19
deadline for filing one.
20
21
22
23
Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED without
prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to mail this recommendation to Plaintiff.
NOTICE
Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2 any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be
24
in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within (14) days after service of this Notice. The
25
Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived
26
due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142
27
(1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986). The Ninth Circuit has also held that (1) failure to file
28
objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable
1
issues waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order and/or appeal factual issues from the
2
order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi
3
Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
4
DATED: February 5, 2024
5
6
7
8
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?