Romero v. Walmart Inc.
Filing
31
ORDER granting 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
TYSON & MENDES LLP
GRIFFITH H. HAYES
Nevada Bar No. 7374
Email: ghayes@tysonmendes.com
CHRISTOPHER A. LUND
Nevada Bar No. 12435
Email: clund@tysonmnedes.com
2835 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 140
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Telephone: (702) 724-2648
Attorneys for Defendant Walmart Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
REX ROMERO, an individual,
CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-01299-JCM-NJK
Plaintiff,
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
12
vs.
13
WALMART INC., a Foreign Corporation; DOE
INDIVIDUALS I-X, inclusive; and ROE
CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive,
14
15
Defendants.
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff REX
18
ROMERO, by and through his counsel, TRAYSEN N. TURNER, ESQ., of THE POWELL LAW
19
FIRM and Defendant WALMART INC., by and through its counsel, GRIFFITH H. HAYES, ESQ.
20
of TYSON & MENDES LLP, that all claims in the present action be dismissed, with prejudice.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
The parties further stipulate that each party will bear its/their own attorney fees and costs.
2
3
DATED this 24th day of October 2024.
DATED this 24th day of October 2024.
4
TYSON & MENDES LLP
THE POWELL LAW FIRM
5
_/s/ Griffith Hayes_____________
GRIFFITH HAYES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7374
CHRISTOPHER A. LUND
Nevada Bar No. 12435
2835 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 140
Henderson, NV 89052
Attorneys for Defendant Walmart, Inc.
__/s/ Traysen N. Turner___ _______________
Traysen N. Turner (16017)
Paul D. D. Powell (7488)
THE POWELL LAW FIRM
8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
paul@tplf.com
tstewart@tplf.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, the Court having reviewed all pleadings and
papers on file herein, and good cause appearing.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case in its entirety, is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE
each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs herein.
DATED October 25, 2024.
18
19
DISTRICT
COURT
JUDGE JUDGE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Respectfully Submitted by:
TYSON & MENDES LLP
/s/ Griffith H. Hayes
GRIFFITH H. HAYES
Nevada Bar No. 7374
JENNIFER TANG
Nevada Bar No. 14628
2835 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 140
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Attorneys for Defendant, Sam’s West, Inc
28
2
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Traysen Turner
Nick Psyk
Gabriela Vazquez; Heidi Brown; Zaira Baldovinos; Tiffany Plumer; Griffith Hayes; Kelly Knaus
Re: Romero v. Walmart ( TM 23-2807)
Thursday, October 24, 2024 2:33:13 PM
image001.png
Nick,
Thank you for preparing this. You may attach my e-signature.
Thanks,
Traysen
From: Nick Psyk
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2024 2:27:44 PM
To: Traysen Turner
Cc: Gabriela Vazquez ; Heidi Brown ; Zaira
Baldovinos ; Tiffany Plumer ; Griffith Hayes
; Kelly Knaus
Subject: RE: Romero v. Walmart ( TM 23-2807)
Traysen,
Please find attached a draft SAO for Dismissal of the above case. Please let me know if you have any
revisions. Otherwise, please let me know if we have your authority to affix your e-signature for
submission to the Court.
Thank you,
Nicholas Psyk
Attorney
2835 St. Rose Pkwy., Suite 140
Henderson, NV 89052
Main: 702.724.2648
Direct: 725.235.7475
Fax: 702.410.7684
NPsyk@tysonmendes.com
www.tysonmendes.com
This email and any attachments are from the law firm of Tyson & Mendes, LLP. This email is intended only for
the use of the addressee and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential, privileged, or protected
by state or federal law. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
contents of this email and attachments are prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify us by
reply email immediately so we may arrange for the retrieval of the information.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?