Calleros v. City of North Las Vegas

Filing 59

ORDER granting 58 Stipulation TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF No. 44 (Fifth Request). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order granting Parties' Stipulation to Extend Deadlines is the last extension the Court will grant regarding the response and reply deadlines to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/16/2024. Replies due by 1/16/2025. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MELANIE A. HILL Nevada Bar No. 8796 MELANIE HILL LAW PLLC 1925 Village Center Circle, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Tel: (702) 362-8500 Fax: (702) 362-8505 Email: Melanie@MelanieHillLaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Augustine Calleros, Jr. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 AUGUSTINE CALLEROS, JR., 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, a municipal corporation, STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 44] (Fifth Request) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, Augustine Calleros, Jr. (“Calleros”), by and through his counsel, Melanie Hill Law, 18 19 CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-01340-GMN-DJA and Defendant City of North Las Vegas (“CNLV”), by and through its counsel, Madison Zornes-Vela, 20 hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Mr. Calleros to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary 21 Judgment filed on August 28, 2024 [ECF No. 44] from the current deadline of November 25, 2024 up 22 to and including December 16, 2024. The parties further stipulate to extend the deadline for CNLV to 23 24 reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment from the current deadline of December 16, 2024 up to and including January 16, 2025. This Stipulation is made at the request of Plaintiff’s counsel for 25 26 27 28 Melanie Hill Law PLLC 1925 Village Center Circle Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 (702) 362-8500 the reasons set forth herein. This is the fifth request to extend the deadline to respond to this dispositive motion. /// 1 of 3 In support of this Stipulation and Order, the parties state as follows: 1 1. 2 The current deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Defendant’s Motion for Summary 3 Judgment filed on August 28, 2024 [ECF No. 44] is November 25, 2024. The parties have agreed to a 4 fifth extension of the deadline from the current deadline of November 25, 2024 until December 16, 5 2024. 6 7 8 9 2. Counsel for Plaintiff reached out to counsel for Defendant requesting an additional extension of the response deadline due to an unexpected family emergency discussed in detail with counsel for Defendant and in light of the fact that the Court recently extended the settlement conference 10 to February 20, 2025. Defendant’s counsel agreed to the requested extension. The parties also agreed 11 to extend the CNLV’s reply deadline due to the upcoming holidays and the parties agreed to a one 12 month extension of the reply deadline until January 16, 2024. 13 14 3. This stipulation to extend the dispositive motion deadlines is brought in good faith, with a showing of good cause, and is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay, but to 15 16 17 allow counsel for the Plaintiff the additional time requested to respond to the dispositive motion considering the issues she has described herein constituting good cause for the extension. 18 WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request by this stipulation that the Court extend the 19 deadline for Mr. Calleros to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on August 20 28, 2024 [ECF No. 44] from the current deadline of November 25, 2024 to December 16, 2024. 21 22 23 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Melanie Hill Law PLLC 1925 Village Center Circle Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 (702) 362-8500 2 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?