Seligman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC. et al

Filing 40

ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation for Dismissal. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/9/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
Case 2:23-cv-01410-JCM-MDC Document 39 Filed 05/06/24 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 George Haines, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 9411 Gerardo Avalos, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 15171 FREEDOM LAW FIRM 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 880-5554 (702) 385-5518 (fax) Ghaines@freedomlegalteam.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Louis Seligman 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 Louis Seligman, 14 Plaintiff, 17 18 Stipulation Synchrony prejudice. v. 15 16 Case No.: 2:23-cv-01410 Equifax Information Services, LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; Synchrony Financial and Comenity Capital Bank, for dismissal of Financial with 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Louis Seligman and Synchrony Financial stipulate to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Synchrony Financial with prejudice. /// /// /// /// /// _____________________ STIPULATION -1- Case 2:23-cv-01410-JCM-MDC Document 39 Filed 05/06/24 Page 2 of 2 1 Each party will bear its own costs, disbursements, and attorney fees. 2 Dated: May 6, 2024. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FREEDOM LAW FIRM /s/ George Haines . George Haines, Esq. 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Counsel for Plaintiff Louis Seligman 10 11 12 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Brittni A. Tanenbaum J Christopher Jorgensen, Esq. Brittni A. Tanenbaum, Esq. 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Counsel for Synchrony Bank . 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 21 _______________________________ UNITES STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 May 9, 2024 DATED:________________________ 24 25 26 27 _____________________ STIPULATION -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?