Bang et al v. New Prime, Inc. et al

Filing 30

ORDER granting 25 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In accordance with my prior order ECF No. 26 , the parties must submit a second proposed joint pretrial order by April 11, 2025. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 3/11/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 4 Young Tae Bang, et al., Plaintiffs 5 6 v. 7 New Prime, Inc., et al., 8 Case No. 2:23-cv-01428-CDS-NJK Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 25] Defendants 9 10 Defendants New Prime, Inc. and Jesus Espinoza move for partial summary judgment on 11 plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages. ECF No. 25. 1 Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion. ECF No. 12 27. After reviewing the complaint and the exhibits attached to the motion, I agree that, even in 13 the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, summary judgment on the punitive damages claim is 14 warranted. Therefore I grant defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [ECF No. 25]. 15 In accordance with my prior order (ECF No. 26), the parties must submit a second proposed 16 joint pretrial order by April 11, 2025. 17 18 19 Dated: March 11, 2025 ________________ ________________ Cristina D. Silva United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 The motion for partial summary judgment was filed on behalf of defendants “GUILLERMO PEGUERO (incorrectly identified as GABRIEL P. GUILLERMO), NEW PRIME, INC. and PEGUERO TRUCKING 26 SERVICES, LLC.” ECF No. 25 at 1. Because New Prime, Inc. and Jesus Espinoza are the named defendants in this case, a corrected image was filed on March 10, 2025. ECF No. 29.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?