Sternberg v. Warneck et al

Filing 252

ORDER granting 223 Motion to Extend Time to Answer to 86 Amended Complaint. City of San Jose, California answer due 7/12/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 7/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 MICHAEL C. STERNBERG, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 Case No. 2:23-cv-01466-APG-EJY v. ORDER SHELLEY WARNECK, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court is the Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed 11 by City of San Jose on June 17, 2024. ECF No. 223. No timely response to this Motion was filed. 1 12 Under Local Rule 7-2(d) the Court may treat the failure of the nonmoving party to respond to a 13 motion as consent to grant the motion. 14 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. 223) is GRANTED. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the response by City of San Jose is due July 12, 2024. 17 Dated this 8th day of July, 2024. 18 19 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court recognizes Plaintiff filed a Notice of California State Bar Professional Misconduct Complaint re: Maren Clouse at ECF No. 225. This filing is silent with respect to the requested extension. 1 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?