Hayes v. GKS Development, Inc

Filing 33

ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss as unopposed. IT IS FURTHER ORDER that plaintiff Carolyn Hayes has until June 5, 2024 to properly serve defendant GKS Development, Inc. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 CAROLYN HAYES, 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-01678-APG-BNW Order Granting Second Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 22] 6 GKS DEVELOPMENT, INC., 7 8 Defendant Plaintiff Carolyn Hayes sues her former employer, defendant GKS Development, Inc. 9 ECF No. 5. I granted GKS’s prior motion to dismiss because Hayes did not properly serve GKS. 10 ECF No. 18. GKS again moves to dismiss, arguing that Hayes has again failed to properly serve 11 it. ECF No. 22. Hayes did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that “[t]he failure 12 of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion . . . constitutes a 13 consent to the granting of the motion.” I therefore grant GKS’s motion as unopposed. 14 However, because it is possible that Hayes could effect proper service, I will grant her 15 one final chance to do so. I again encourage Hayes to review Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 16 to understand how to properly serve GKS. 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that defendant GKS’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is 18 granted as unopposed. 19 I FURTHER ORDER that plaintiff Carolyn Hayes has until June 5, 2024 to properly 20 serve defendant GKS Development, Inc. 21 22 23 DATED this 8th day of May, 2024. ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?