Spikes v. Altig et al

Filing 5

ORDER Denying without prejudice #4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has until Wednesday, March 6, 2024, to either file a new IFP application or pay the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons. The Court will issue a screening order on the complaint after Spikes either files a new IFP or pays the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff is transferred, the Accounting Supervisor at Florence McClure Womens Correctional Center is directed to send a copy of this Order to the new place of incarceration and indicate the amount that plaintiff has paid towards his filing fee so that funds may continue to be deducted from his account. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must send a copy of this Order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office and to Florence McClure Womens Correctional Center Accounting Supervisor, 4370 Smiley, Las Vegas, NV 89115. IFP or Payment of Filing Fees due 3/6/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 2/6/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF. CC: Finance. Copy of Order mailed to Florence McClure Women's Correctional Center Accounting Supervisor, 4370 Smiley, Las Vegas, NV 89115. - RJDG)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4

***
Quiwaneca Spikes,

5

Plaintiff,

6

vs.

7

Steven Altig et al.,

ORDER
Defendants.

8

Case No. 2:23-cv-02127-GMN-MDC

9

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(EFC NO. 4)

10
11
12
13
14

Pro se plaintiff Quiwaneca Spikes filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4)
and a proposed complaint. ECF No. 1-1. The Court denies her IFP application. ECF No. 4.
I.

Plaintiff’s IFP Application

15

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action "without prepayment of fees or

16

security thereof" if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff "is unable to

17

pay such fees or give security therefor." If the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h),

18

as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), he must pay the entire fee in installments,

19

regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v.

20

Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

21
22
23
24
25

Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a "certified copy of the trust
fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-month period immediately
preceding the filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th
Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the Court must assess an initial payment of 20% of
(a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance

1
2

in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having custody of the prisoner must collect

3

subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any month in which the

4

prisoner's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid.

5

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Even if this action is dismissed, the prisoner must still pay the full filing fee

6

pursuant to § 1915(b) and the monthly payments from his inmate account will continue until the balance

7

is paid.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Florence McClure Women’s Correctional Center
(“FMWCC”). ECF No. 1-1. The Court finds the IFP application incomplete. In addition to leaving
question 1(b) blank, the fourth page of plaintiff’s IFP application is missing the authorized officer’s
signature. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff also failed to file a declaration and a certified copy of the trust fund account
statement per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The Court will give plaintiff another chance to file a complete IFP.
The plaintiff must provide the authorizing officer’s signature and must file a certified copy of the inmate
trust fund account statement.
ACCORDINGLY,

17

IT IS ORDERED that Spike's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) is DENIED

18

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has until Wednesday, March 6, 2024, to either file a
new IFP application or pay the filing fee.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons. The
Court will issue a screening order on the complaint after Spikes either files a new IFP or pays the filing
fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

25

2

1
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff is transferred, the Accounting Supervisor at Florence
McClure Women’s Correctional Center is directed to send a copy of this Order to the new place of

3

incarceration and indicate the amount that plaintiff has paid towards his filing fee so that funds may

4

continue to be deducted from his account.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must send a copy of this Order to the

6

Finance Division of the Clerk's Office and to Florence McClure Women’s Correctional Center Accounting

7

Supervisor, 4370 Smiley, Las Vegas, NV 89115.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

//
//
//
//
//
NOTICE
Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and

16

recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk

17

of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal

18

may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified

19

time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985).

20
21
22
23
24
25

This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure
to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court's order
and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157
(9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR
IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any change of address.
3

1
2
3

The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing
party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of
the action.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

DATED this 6th day of February 2024.

6
7

_________________________
Maximiliano D. Couvillier III
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

4