Jenrett v. McPartlin et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting 29 Motion to Stay Discovery. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/29/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5
6
7
8
9
10

Plaintiff(s),

Order

v.

[Docket No. 29]

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et
al.,

11
12

Case No. 2:24-cv-00002-APG-NJK

MELISA JENRETT,

Defendant(s).
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of

13 their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 15.1 Plaintiff filed a response regarding her evidence. Docket
14 No. 30.2 The Court has considered the governing test, Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294
15 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), and finds that a stay of discovery is warranted. Accordingly, the
16 Court GRANTS the motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. In the
17 event the underlying motion to dismiss is not granted in full, a joint status report or joint discovery
18 plan must be filed within 14 days of the resolution of the motion to dismiss.
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

Dated: August 29, 2024

21

______________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed. Docket Nos. 23, 24 (errata), 26, 27.

2

The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S.
89, 94 (2007).
1