Worthams v. GEICO Choice Insurance Company et al
Filing
122
ORDER Granting 121 Stipulation for Extension of time (First Request) for GEICO's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave of Court to Serve Subpoenas on Witness Sharithea Everett by Alternative Means re 110 Motion. Replies due by 3/10/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/5/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
2 Jonathan W. Carlson
Nevada Bar No. 10536
3
jonathan.carlson@mccormickbarstow.com
Mandy Vogel
4 Nevada Bar No. 16150
mandy.vogel@mccormickbarstow.com
5 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
6 Telephone:
(702) 949-1100
Facsimile:
(702) 949-1101
7
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
8 Cary B. Lerman (admitted pro hac vice)
California Bar No. 54937
9
cary.lerman@mto.com
Joseph N. Glynn (admitted pro hac vice)
10 California Bar No. 337652
joseph.glynn@mto.com
11 350 South Grand Ave, 50th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
12 Telephone:
(213) 683-9100
13 J. Max Rosen (admitted pro hac vice)
California Bar No. 310789
14
max.rosen@mto.com
560 Mission Street, 27th Floor
15 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
(415) 512-4000
16
Attorneys for Defendant
17 GEICO Choice Insurance Company
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
20
21 WILLIE WORTHAMS, individually,
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23
GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY,
24 a foreign entity; LEWIS BRISBOIS
BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP, a foreign
25 limited liability partnership; LEWIS ROCA
ROTHGERBER, CHRISTIE, LLP, a foreign
26 limited liability partnership; DOES I through
X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I
27 through V, inclusive,
Defendants.
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 WEST SUNSET ROAD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113
Case No. 2:24-cv-00023-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR GEICO’S REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR LEAVE
OF COURT TO SERVE SUBPOENAS ON
WITNESS SHARITHEA EVERETT BY
ALTERNATIVE MEANS (DKT. 110)
(FIRST REQUEST)
Case No. 2:24-cv-00023-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR GEICO’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
LEAVE OF COURT TO SERVE SUBPOENAS ON WITNESS SHARITHEA EVERETT BY ALTERNATIVE
MEANS (DKT. 110) (FIRST REQUEST)
1
Defendant GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY (“GEICO”), by and through its
2 attorneys of record of the law firms McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE &
3 CARRUTH LLP and MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP, and Plaintiff WILLIE WORTHAMS
4 (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record of the BOWEN LAW OFFICES have stipulated
5 and agreed to a five (5) day extension of time from March 5, 2025 to March 10, 2025 for GEICO to
6 file its Reply In Support Of Motion for Leave of Court to Serve Subpoenas on Witness Sharithea
7 Everett by Alternative Means, for good cause.
8
In the past seven days, GEICO’s counsel had a number of unavoidable obligations amongst
9 all named counsel, to include overlapping briefing deadlines, all-day depositions, examinations
10 under oath, court appearance, and work travel. Consequently, GEICO’s counsel requires additional
11 time to adequately complete its briefing.
12
This is the first extension of time requested by the parties related to this reply brief. The
13 parties have stipulated to this extension in good faith and not for purposes of delay. The parties
14 previously stipulated to a five day extension of Plaintiff’s opposition brief with respect to
15 Defendants’ motion.
DATED this 4th day of March, 2025
16
17
BOWEN LAW OFFICES
18
By
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 WEST SUNSET ROAD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113
/s/ Jerome R. Bowen
Jerome R. Bowen, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 4540
Attorneys for Plaintiff
///
///
///
///
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2025
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge
///
///
///
///
///
Case No. 2:24-cv-00023-RFB-NJK
2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR GEICO’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
LEAVE OF COURT TO SERVE SUBPOENAS ON WITNESS SHARITHEA EVERETT BY ALTERNATIVE
MEANS (DKT. 110) (FIRST REQUEST)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?