McAllister et al v. Clark County

Filing 48

ORDER Granting 47 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 45 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 7/12/2024. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/3/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 STEVEN B. WOLFSON District Attorney CIVIL DIVISION Bar No. 1565 By: JOEL K. BROWNING Deputy District Attorney Bar No. 14489 By: JEFFREY S. ROGAN Deputy District Attorney State Bar No. 010734 500 South Grand Central Pkwy., Suite 5075 Las Vegas, Nevada 89155-2215 Telephone (702) 455-4761 Fax (702) 382-5178 E-Mail: Joel.Browning@ClarkCountyDA.com E-Mail: Jeffrey.Rogan@ClarkCountyDA.com Attorneys for Defendant Clark County 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 LISA MCALLISTER, an individual; and BRANDOM SUMMERS, an individual, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 vs. CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Nevada. 17 18 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY’S 12(b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF LISA MCALLISTER AND HER ADA CLAIMS FOR LACK OF STANDING [45] (First Request) 19 20 2:24-cv-00334-JAD-NJK [ECF No. 47] IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS, THAT: 21 22 1. Defendant Clark County filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Lisa McAllister and 23 Her ADA Claims for Lack of Standing [45] on June 14, 2024; Plaintiffs filed their 24 Response on June 28, 2024 [46]; Defendant’s reply is due Friday, July 5, 2024; and, 25 2. Defendant Clark County may have until Friday, July 12, 2024, to reply to Plaintiffs’ 26 Response [46] to Defendant Clark County’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Lisa 27 McAllister and Her ADA Claims for Lack of Standing [45]; and 28 S:\LIT\M-O\McAllister, Lisa\Pleadings\2024.07.02 - McAllister_SAO Reply Deadline_JKB.docx\ab 1 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?