Yoo et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Filing 8

ORDER Remanding Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: Certified copy of order and docket sheet mailed to State Court - MAM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 RICHARD W. YOO and JANE Y. YOO,

Case No.: 2:24-cv-00409-APG-MDC

4

Order Remanding Case for Lack of
Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Plaintiffs

5 v.
6 PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE
COMPANY,
7
Defendant
8
9

Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company removed this action based on diversity

10 jurisdiction. ECF No. 1. However, Progressive did not identify its principal place of business, so
11 I could not determine if complete diversity exists and Progressive did not show the amount in
12 controversy requirement has been satisfied. Consequently, I ordered Progressive to show cause
13 why this action should not be remanded to state court. ECF No. 4. Progressive did not timely
14 respond to the order to show cause. Even if I considered Progressive’s statement regarding
15 removal as a response, it does not correct the identified deficiencies in the petition for removal.
16 ECF No. 7.
17

I THEREFORE ORDER that this action is remanded to the state court from which it was

18 removed for all further proceedings. The clerk of the court is instructed to close this case.
19

DATED this 26th day of March, 2024.

20
21
22
23

ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE