Yoo et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Filing 8

ORDER Remanding Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: Certified copy of order and docket sheet mailed to State Court - MAM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 RICHARD W. YOO and JANE Y. YOO, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00409-APG-MDC 4 Order Remanding Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Plaintiffs 5 v. 6 PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, 7 Defendant 8 9 Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company removed this action based on diversity 10 jurisdiction. ECF No. 1. However, Progressive did not identify its principal place of business, so 11 I could not determine if complete diversity exists and Progressive did not show the amount in 12 controversy requirement has been satisfied. Consequently, I ordered Progressive to show cause 13 why this action should not be remanded to state court. ECF No. 4. Progressive did not timely 14 respond to the order to show cause. Even if I considered Progressive’s statement regarding 15 removal as a response, it does not correct the identified deficiencies in the petition for removal. 16 ECF No. 7. 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that this action is remanded to the state court from which it was 18 removed for all further proceedings. The clerk of the court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 26th day of March, 2024. 20 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?