Humphrey v. County of Henderson et al

Filing 6

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7 (ECF No. 4 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 28, 2024, Plaintiff must file her updated address with the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 28, 2024, Plaintiff must either pay the $405 filing fee for a civil action or file with the Court a complete IFP Application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will retain Pl aintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but will not file it at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for inmate along with the information and instructions for filing the same. (Mailed 6/4/2024). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 6/3/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 DISTRICT OF NEVADA DARRIANA HUMPHREY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:24-cv-00456-GMN-EJY ORDER COUNTY OF HENDERSON, et al., Defendants. On March 4, 2024, Plaintiff submitted a Civil Rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 contending she is a pretrial detainee housed at Henderson County Detention Center (“HCDC”). ECF No. 1-1. Plaintiff neither paid the $405 filing fee for a civil action nor applied to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 1. On March 14, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7 arguing HCDC has no system to “comply with the court order to sign the IFP form and allow the plaintiff to proceed with her case.” ECF No. 4. Plaintiff asks the Court to order HCDC to provide the financial documents necessary for her to properly apply for IFP status. Id. Two weeks later, on March 28, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice that she had been transferred to Dakota County Jail (“DCJ”) in Hastings, Minnesota. ECF No. 5. According to DCJ’s inmate database Plaintiff is no longer housed at that facility and fails to file her updated address with the Court in compliance with Local Rule IA 3-1. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7 (ECF No. 4) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 28, 2024, Plaintiff must file her updated address with the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 28, 2024, Plaintiff must either pay the $405 filing fee for a civil action or file with the Court (1) a complete Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate on the Court’s approved form; (2) a Financial Certificate properly 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 signed by both the inmate and a prison or jail official; and (3) a copy of the inmate’s prison or jail trust fund account statement for the previous six-month period IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s failure to update her address and either pay the $405 filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before June 28, 2024, will result in a recommendation to dismiss this action without prejudice. A dismissal without prejudice allows Plaintiff to file her case with the Court, under a new case number, when she is able to comply with LSR 2-1 and file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will retain Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but will not file it at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for inmate along with the information and instructions for filing the same. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2024. ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?