Willey v. BMW of North America, LLC et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting #30 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #19 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 4/16/2024. Replies due by 4/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

1 GREGORY A. KRAEMER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 010911
2 MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
400 S. Street, Suite 500
3
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
4 [phone]
[e-mail]
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RICHARD L. WILLEY, JR.,

)
Case No.: 2:24-cv-00467-JCM-EJY
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
)
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, and )
DEFENDANT BAYERISCHE
) MOTOREN WERKE AG’S MOTION TO
WUTHRICH BMW LLC,
)
DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL
)
Defendants.
JURISDICTION
)
(First Request)
)
)
)

17
18

The parties, through their respective undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of

19 Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule IA 6-1, hereby stipulate to a fourteen-day extension
20 of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Bayerische Motoren Werke AG’s Motion to
21 Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 19), filed on March 19, 2024. Plaintiff’s
22 current deadline to respond is April 2, 2024. The parties therefore stipulate to extend the
23 response deadline to April 16, 2024. This is the first request to extend this deadline. There is
24 currently no hearing scheduled on this motion.
25

This is a complex product liability action arising out of injuries Plaintiff alleges he

26 suffered while driving a 2001 BMW 325Ci. Through the instant lawsuit, Plaintiff sues
27 Defendant, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (“BMW AG”), for its role in allegedly designing,
28 manufacturing, and producing the subject BMW vehicle in a defective condition. On March 19,
-1-

1 2024, BMW AG appeared in this case and filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal
2 jurisdiction. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff needs additional time to marshal jurisdictional evidence to
3 oppose BMW AG’s motion and to prepare his response brief. The parties therefore stipulate to a
4 fourteen-day extension—or until April 16, 2024—for Plaintiff to respond to the motion.
5

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiff, RICHARD L.

6 WILLEY, JR., shall have until April 16, 2024 to respond to Defendant Bayerische Motoren
7 Werke AG’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Defendant Bayerische
8 Motoren Werke AG shall then have until April 30, 2024 to file its reply.
9
10 Dated: March 25, 2024
11 /s/ Gregory A. Kraemer
GREGORY A. KRAEMER, ESQ.
12 Nevada Bar No.: 010911
MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
13
400 S. Street, Suite 500
14 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
[phone]
15 [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
16
17
18
19
20

/s/ Thomas P. Branigan
Mario D. Valencia
Nevada Bar No. 6154
40 South Stephanie Street, Suite 201
Henderson, NV 89012
[phone]
Thomas P. Branigan (pro hac vice)
Matthew G. Berard (pro hac vice)
Matin Fallahi (pro hac vice)
Bowman and Brooke LLP
101 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1100
Troy, MI 48084 [phone]
Attorneys for BMW of North America, LLC
and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED:

23
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26

March 26, 2024
DATED: ___________________________

27
28
-2-