Willey v. BMW of North America, LLC et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting 30 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 19 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 4/16/2024. Replies due by 4/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 GREGORY A. KRAEMER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 010911 2 MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 400 S. Street, Suite 500 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 4 (689) 285-6961 gkraemer@forthepeople.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RICHARD L. WILLEY, JR., ) Case No.: 2:24-cv-00467-JCM-EJY ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO ) BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, and ) DEFENDANT BAYERISCHE ) MOTOREN WERKE AG’S MOTION TO WUTHRICH BMW LLC, ) DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL ) Defendants. JURISDICTION ) (First Request) ) ) ) 17 18 The parties, through their respective undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of 19 Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule IA 6-1, hereby stipulate to a fourteen-day extension 20 of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Bayerische Motoren Werke AG’s Motion to 21 Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 19), filed on March 19, 2024. Plaintiff’s 22 current deadline to respond is April 2, 2024. The parties therefore stipulate to extend the 23 response deadline to April 16, 2024. This is the first request to extend this deadline. There is 24 currently no hearing scheduled on this motion. 25 This is a complex product liability action arising out of injuries Plaintiff alleges he 26 suffered while driving a 2001 BMW 325Ci. Through the instant lawsuit, Plaintiff sues 27 Defendant, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (“BMW AG”), for its role in allegedly designing, 28 manufacturing, and producing the subject BMW vehicle in a defective condition. On March 19, -1- 1 2024, BMW AG appeared in this case and filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal 2 jurisdiction. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff needs additional time to marshal jurisdictional evidence to 3 oppose BMW AG’s motion and to prepare his response brief. The parties therefore stipulate to a 4 fourteen-day extension—or until April 16, 2024—for Plaintiff to respond to the motion. 5 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiff, RICHARD L. 6 WILLEY, JR., shall have until April 16, 2024 to respond to Defendant Bayerische Motoren 7 Werke AG’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Defendant Bayerische 8 Motoren Werke AG shall then have until April 30, 2024 to file its reply. 9 10 Dated: March 25, 2024 11 /s/ Gregory A. Kraemer GREGORY A. KRAEMER, ESQ. 12 Nevada Bar No.: 010911 MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 13 400 S. Street, Suite 500 14 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (689) 285-6961 15 gkraemer@forthepeople.com Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Thomas P. Branigan Mario D. Valencia Nevada Bar No. 6154 40 South Stephanie Street, Suite 201 Henderson, NV 89012 (702) 384-7494 Thomas P. Branigan (pro hac vice) Matthew G. Berard (pro hac vice) Matin Fallahi (pro hac vice) Bowman and Brooke LLP 101 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1100 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 205-3348 Attorneys for BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: 23 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 March 26, 2024 DATED: ___________________________ 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?