Brown v. AMA/NYAG

Filing 25

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion ECF No. 21 and applications to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. 22 and 24 are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/10/2024. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5
6
7
8
9

***
Jessica M. Brown,

Case No. 2:24-cv-00471-JAD-DJA
Plaintiff,

Order

v.
AMA/NYAG for Walmart LLC,
Defendant.

10
11
12

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “motion for information” (ECF No. 21) and applications to

13

proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 22 and 24). Plaintiff’s motion does not describe any

14

actionable relief that the Court can provide and does not describe the legal basis for that relief.

15

Instead, it appears to be Plaintiff’s attempt to submit evidence to the Court. However, the Court

16

is not a repository for evidence. Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis are also

17

moot because the Court already granted her leave to proceed without paying the filing fee (ECF

18

No. 15).

19
20
21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 21) and applications
to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 22 and 24) are denied.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: May 10, 2024
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE