Brown v. AMA/NYAG

Filing 25

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion ECF No. 21 and applications to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. 22 and 24 are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/10/2024. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 7 8 9 *** Jessica M. Brown, Case No. 2:24-cv-00471-JAD-DJA Plaintiff, Order v. AMA/NYAG for Walmart LLC, Defendant. 10 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “motion for information” (ECF No. 21) and applications to 13 proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 22 and 24). Plaintiff’s motion does not describe any 14 actionable relief that the Court can provide and does not describe the legal basis for that relief. 15 Instead, it appears to be Plaintiff’s attempt to submit evidence to the Court. However, the Court 16 is not a repository for evidence. Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis are also 17 moot because the Court already granted her leave to proceed without paying the filing fee (ECF 18 No. 15). 19 20 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 21) and applications to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 22 and 24) are denied. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: May 10, 2024 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?