Patel v. Pal USA, INC et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion seeking authorization to electronically file in this case is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward the Consent for Electronic Service of Documents (ECF No. 5) to the Help Desk to configure Plaintiff's CM/ECF account. Plaintiff must contact the CM/ECF Help Desk at [phone] to configure Plaintiffs CM/ECF account. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Remote Appearance is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/27/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

DINESH PATEL,

5

Plaintiff,

6
7

Case No. 2:24-cv-00536-APG-EJY

v.

ORDER

PAL USA, INC., et al.,

8

Defendants.

9
10

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Authorization to E-file and for Remote

11

Appearance. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has met the requirements for E-filing; thus, this request is granted

12

below.

13

Plaintiff seeks a blanket order from the Court allowing him to appear remotely in this matter.

14

Plaintiff says he lives out of state and the distance between his home and the District of Nevada is

15

substantial. However, whether remote appearance will be permitted in the future is a decision each

16

judge assigned to the case will make dependent upon the particular issue being considered by that

17

judge.

18
19
20
21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Authorization to E-file
and for Remote Appearance (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion seeking authorization to electronically
file in this case is GRANTED.

22

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward the Consent for Electronic

23

Service of Documents (ECF No. 5) to the Help Desk to configure Plaintiff’s CM/ECF account.

24

Plaintiff must contact the CM/ECF Help Desk at [phone] to configure Plaintiff’s CM/ECF

25

account.

26
27
28
1

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Remote Appearance is DENIED
without prejudice.
Dated this 27th day of March, 2024.

4
5
6

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2