Franks v. Lens.com, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Stipulation to extend time to respond to complaint. Lens.com, Inc. answer due 6/14/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/10/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP Richard J. Pocker (SBN 3568) Email: rpocker@bsfllp.com 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 800 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 382-7300 THORPE NORTH & WESTERN LLP Mark M. Bettilyon (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) Email: mark.bettilyon@tnw.com Jed H. Hansen (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) Email: hansen@tnw.com 175 South Main, Suite 900 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 566-6633 Attorneys for Defendants Lens.com, Inc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 15 OREN FRANKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 v. LENS.COM, INC., Defendants. Case No.: 2:24-cv-0724 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT LENS.COM, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey Action Filed: April 12, 2024 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT STIPULATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on April 12, 2024, Plaintiff Oren Franks (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant Lens.com, Inc. (“Defendant”, together the “Parties”); WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendant to answer the Complaint is May 15, 2024; WHEREAS, the Parties are attempting to resolve various issues in this 7 matter and thus need to extend Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive pleading 8 to the Complaint; 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint up to and including June 14, 2024; and WHEREAS, this is the first request for an extension of Defendant to respond 12 to the Complaint, the extension will not alter the date of any other event or any 13 deadline already fixed by Court order, and this request is not being made for the 14 purpose of delay or any other improper purpose. 15 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 16 Parties, through their respective counsel, that Defendant shall file a responsive 17 pleading to the Complaint by June 14, 2024. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 21 DATED: May 8, 2024 BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 22 By: /s/ Richard J. Pocker Richard J. Pocker 23 Attorneys for Defendant 24 25 MAZIE SLATER KATZ FREEMAN 26 27 By: /s/ Matthew R. Mendelsohn Matthew R. Mendelsohn 28 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 The Court, having considered the Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, finds there is good cause to order that 4 5 Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint be extended to 6 and including June 14, 2024. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 May 10, 2024 Dated:____________________ _________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?