Franks v. Lens.com, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER granting #10 Stipulation to extend time to respond to complaint. Lens.com, Inc. answer due 6/14/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/10/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
Richard J. Pocker (SBN 3568)
Email: [e-mail]
300 South Fourth Street, Suite 800
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
THORPE NORTH & WESTERN LLP
Mark M. Bettilyon (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)
Email: [e-mail]
Jed H. Hansen (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)
Email: [e-mail]
175 South Main, Suite 900
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Lens.com, Inc.

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13
14
15

OREN FRANKS, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19

v.
LENS.COM, INC.,
Defendants.

Case No.: 2:24-cv-0724
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT LENS.COM, INC.
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Action Filed:

April 12, 2024

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, on April 12, 2024, Plaintiff Oren Franks (“Plaintiff”) filed a
Complaint against Defendant Lens.com, Inc. (“Defendant”, together the “Parties”);
WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendant to answer the Complaint is
May 15, 2024;
WHEREAS, the Parties are attempting to resolve various issues in this

7

matter and thus need to extend Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive pleading

8

to the Complaint;

9
10
11

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to
respond to the Complaint up to and including June 14, 2024; and
WHEREAS, this is the first request for an extension of Defendant to respond

12

to the Complaint, the extension will not alter the date of any other event or any

13

deadline already fixed by Court order, and this request is not being made for the

14

purpose of delay or any other improper purpose.

15

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the

16

Parties, through their respective counsel, that Defendant shall file a responsive

17

pleading to the Complaint by June 14, 2024.

18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

19
20
21

DATED: May 8, 2024

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

22

By: /s/ Richard J. Pocker
Richard J. Pocker

23

Attorneys for Defendant

24
25

MAZIE SLATER KATZ FREEMAN

26
27

By: /s/ Matthew R. Mendelsohn
Matthew R. Mendelsohn

28

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

The Court, having considered the Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant
to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, finds there is good cause to order that

4
5

Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint be extended to

6

and including June 14, 2024.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

May 10, 2024
Dated:____________________

_________________________
United States Magistrate Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT