Tom v. The State of Nevada et al
Filing
17
ORDER - The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to send Tom a courtesy copy of the following to Ely State Prison: (1) a copy of this Order; (2) a copy of the Dismissal Order (ECF No. 11); and (3) a copy of the Judgment (ECF No. 12). (Specified c opies attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/24/2024. (For Distribution by law library.) (Attachments: # 1 Copy ECF No. 11 Order, # 2 Copy ECF No. 12 Judgment)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
***
5
6
7
8
9
Case No. 2:24-cv-00895-MMD-BNW
SEAN RYAN TOM,
v.
Petitioner,
ORDER
THE STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
Respondents.
10
11
On September 20, 2024, this Court dismissed Petitioner Sean Ryan Tom’s Petition
12
for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”) without prejudice and
13
Judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 11, 12.) This Court’s Order and Judgment were
14
returned as undeliverable, noting that Tom has been relocated from High Desert State
15
Prison to Ely State Prison. 1
16
The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to send Tom a courtesy copy of the
17
following to Ely State Prison: (1) a copy of this Order; (2) a copy of the Dismissal Order
18
(ECF No. 11); and (3) a copy of the Judgment (ECF No. 12).
19
DATED THIS 24th Day of September 2024
20
21
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1The
Local Rules of Practice require all parties, including habeas petitioners,
to immediately file with the Court written notice of any change of address. See LR IA 31, LR 2-2. The Local Rules also warn that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the
action, with or without prejudice, or other sanctions as the Court deems appropriate. Id.;
see also Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (“A party, not the district
court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing
address.”).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?