Melo v. Jaddou et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Stipulation to Stay the Proceedings. The Stay is Extended to 4/6/2025. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/10/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)
1 SUE FAHAMI
Acting United States Attorney
2 District of Nevada
Nevada Bar No. 5634
3 CHRISTIAN R. RUIZ
Assistant United States Attorney
4 501 Las Vegas Blvd. So., Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
5 Phone: (702) 388-6336
Fax: (702) 388-6787
6 Christian.Ruiz@usdoj.gov
7 Attorneys for the Federal Defendants
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10 Alberto Mpiana Da Mesquita E Melo,
Case No. 2:24-cv-01030-JAD-EJY
11
Joint Stipulation and Order to
Stay the Proceedings (Fifth
Request)
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS), et al.,
14
Defendant.
15
16
ECF No. 25
Plaintiff and Defendants, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and
17 jointly request that the Court stay all deadlines in this matter and hold this case in abeyance
18 for an additional period of 30 days, or until April 6, 2025.
19
The subject of this litigation concerns Plaintiff’s I-485 application for adjustment of
20 status and I-601 application for waiver of grounds of inadmissibility. Plaintiff asserts
21 Defendants have unduly delayed the processing of his I-485 and I-601 applications.
22
The parties have conferred and may resolve this matter without continued litigation.
23 Since the last stay was granted, Defendants reopened Plaintiff’s administrative applications
24 and granted his I-601 application. Plaintiff’s I-485 application remains pending.
25
Plaintiff, through his counsel, is in the process of preparing a parole request for
26 submission to a third-party agency, the outcome of which may determine the outcome of
27 his I-485 application. Defendants have also requested briefing from Plaintiff to address
28 certain issues in his pending I-485 application. The parties thus request an extension of the
1 stay in the district court proceedings to allow the parties an opportunity to pursue Plaintiff’s
2 parole request and conclude the administrative process. Pending the conclusion of the
3 remaining administrative processing of Plaintiff’s I-485 application and parole request, this
4 litigation may become moot.
5
This is the fifth request to stay the proceedings. This request is not sought for
6 purposes of delay or any other improper purpose, but to facilitate the parties’ efforts to
7 resolve the matter in a “just, speedy, and inexpensive” manner consistent with Fed. R. Civ.
8 P. 1. The parties reserve the ability to seek additional time to finalize resolution, if
9 necessary.
10 / /
11 / /
12 / /
13 / /
14 / /
15 / /
16 / /
17 / /
18 / /
19 / /
20 / /
21 / /
22 / /
23 / /
24 / /
25 / /
26 / /
27 / /
28 / /
2
1
Respectfully submitted this 10th day of March 2025.
2
3
4
5
6
7
SULL & ASSOCIATES, PLLC.
SUE FAHAMI
Acting United States Attorney
/s/ Hardeep Sull
HARDEEP SULL
3753 Howard Hughes Parkway,
Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
(702) 953-9500
dee@sullglobal.com
/s/ Christian R. Ruiz
CHRISTIAN R. RUIZ
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the Federal Defendants
8
9
THE BROOKS LAW FIRM, APC
13
/s/ Carlo Brooks
CARLO BROOKS
Pro hac vice
3826 Grand View Blvd.,
Suite 661472
Los Angeles, CA 90066
(310) 691-9373
carlo@carlobrooks.com
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
12
15
16
ORDER
17
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 25] and good cause appearing, IT IS
ORDERED that THE STAY IS EXTENDED to April 6, 2025.
18
19
20
_________________________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Dated: March 10, 2025
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?