TChutima, Inc. v. Bua Group, LLC

Filing 68

ORDER Denying without prejudice 55 Motion for Leave to Serve a Supplemental Expert Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/7/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8

TCHUTIMA, INC.,

9

Plaintiff(s),

Case No. 2:24-cv-01130-JCM-NJK
Order

10

v.

11

BUA GROUP, LLC,

12

Defendant(s).

13

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve a supplemental expert

[Docket No. 55]

14 report. Docket No. 55. The Court has not identified in that motion any standards for seeking leave
15 from the Court to supplement an expert report. See id. at 10, 11. Moreover, the governing rule
16 contemplates supplementation in appropriate circumstances without seeking judicial pre-approval.
17 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1)(A).1 Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiffs’
18 motion for leave to serve a supplemental expert report.
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

Dated: January 7, 2025

21

______________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27

1

Such supplementation would be subject (if warranted) to the opposing party’s filing of a
motion to exclude or other challenge. See, e.g., Silvagni v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 320 F.R.D. 237,
28 240 n.1 (D. Nev. 2017).
1