App-Order LLC v. Reynolds

Filing 34

ORDER granting 33 Stipulation TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (SECOND REQUEST). Zorts Opposition to Reynolds Motion to Dismiss due December 11, 2024. Reynolds Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss due January 15, 2025. Zorts Reply in support of Motion to Compel Arbitration due December 11, 2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416) John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221) 2 Katrina E. Weil (NSBN 16152) McDONALD CARANO LLP 3 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 4 Telephone: (702) 873-4100 rkay@mcdonaldcarano.com 5 jfortin@mcdonaldcarano.com kweil@mcdonaldcarano.com 6 Attorneys for App-Order LLC dba Zorts Sports 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 APP-ORDER LLC, a Nevada limited liability company DBA Zorts Sports, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 HAROLD REYNOLDS, an individual, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Case No. 2:24-cv-01480-GMN-DJA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (SECOND REQUEST) Under Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff App-Order LLC dba Zorts Sports (“Zorts”) and 17 Defendant Harold Reynolds (“Reynolds”), together with Zorts, the “Parties,” hereby stipulate, 18 agree, and respectfully request that the Court extend the following briefing deadlines: 19 1. On August 12-13, 2024, Zorts filed its complaint and motion to compel arbitration. 20 [ECF Nos. 1; 4]. 21 2. On September 10, 2024, Zorts filed its proof of service of Reynolds. [ECF No. 14]. 22 3. On October 11, 2024, the Parties stipulated and the Court ordered Reynolds could 23 obtain an extension of time until October 30, 2024, to file a responsive pleading and a response to 24 Zorts’ motion to compel arbitration. [ECF Nos. 16; 19]. 25 4. Reynolds timely filed his motion to dismiss and his opposition to Zorts’ motion to 26 compel arbitration. [ECF Nos. 23; 25]. 27 5. On November 5, 2024, the Parties stipulated and the Court ordered that Zorts could 28 obtain an extension of time until November 27, 2024, to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss, 1 and a reply in support of the motion to compel arbitration. Reynolds’ reply to the motion to dismiss 2 would then be due on December 18, 2024. [ECF Nos. 29; 30]. 3 6. Given multiple pending deadlines in other matters, and the upcoming holidays, the 4 Parties met and conferred and agreed to extend the following deadlines. 5 Deadline Current Date Proposed New Date 6 Zorts’ Opposition to November 27, 2024 December 11, 2024 7 Reynolds’ Motion to Dismiss 8 Zorts Reply in support of November 27, 2024 December 11, 2024 9 Motion to Compel Arbitration 10 Reynolds’ Reply in support of December 18, 2024 January 15, 2025 11 Motion to Dismiss 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 2 1 The Parties do not seek this extension for purposes of delay, and this is the second request 2 for an extension of time on these briefs. 3 DATED this 25th day of November, 2024. DATED this 25th day of November, 2024. 4 McDONALD CARANO LLP KEMP JONES, LLP 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 By: /s/ Rory T. Kay Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416) John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221) Katrina E. Weil (NSBN 16152) 2300 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102 rkay@mcdonaldcarano.com jfortin@mcdonaldcarano.com kweil@mcdonaldcarano.com By: /s/ Mona Kaveh Nathanael R. Rulis, Esq. (NSBN 11259) Mona Kaveh, Esq. (NSBN 11825) Joseph D. Laurita, Esq. (NSBN 16267) KEMP JONES, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 17th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 n.rulis@kempjones.com m.kaveh@kempjones.com j.laurita@kempjones.com Attorneys for App-Order LLC dba Zorts Sports Megan S. Wright, Esq. (pro hac vice) Nathan T. Heimes, Esq. (pro hac vice) CLINE WILLIAMS WRIGHT JOHNSON & OLDFATHER, L.L.P. 12910 Pierce Street, Street 200 Omaha, Nebraska 68144 mwright@clinewilliams.com nheimes@clinewilliams.com 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant 17 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED: ______ _____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 Dated: 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 November 25, 2024

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?