App-Order LLC v. Reynolds
Filing
34
ORDER granting 33 Stipulation TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (SECOND REQUEST). Zorts Opposition to Reynolds Motion to Dismiss due December 11, 2024. Reynolds Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss due January 15, 2025. Zorts Reply in support of Motion to Compel Arbitration due December 11, 2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
1 Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221)
2 Katrina E. Weil (NSBN 16152)
McDONALD CARANO LLP
3 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
4 Telephone: (702) 873-4100
rkay@mcdonaldcarano.com
5 jfortin@mcdonaldcarano.com
kweil@mcdonaldcarano.com
6
Attorneys for App-Order LLC dba Zorts Sports
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10 APP-ORDER LLC, a Nevada limited liability
company DBA Zorts Sports,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
HAROLD REYNOLDS, an individual,
14
Defendant.
15
16
Case No. 2:24-cv-01480-GMN-DJA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(SECOND REQUEST)
Under Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff App-Order LLC dba Zorts Sports (“Zorts”) and
17 Defendant Harold Reynolds (“Reynolds”), together with Zorts, the “Parties,” hereby stipulate,
18 agree, and respectfully request that the Court extend the following briefing deadlines:
19
1.
On August 12-13, 2024, Zorts filed its complaint and motion to compel arbitration.
20 [ECF Nos. 1; 4].
21
2.
On September 10, 2024, Zorts filed its proof of service of Reynolds. [ECF No. 14].
22
3.
On October 11, 2024, the Parties stipulated and the Court ordered Reynolds could
23 obtain an extension of time until October 30, 2024, to file a responsive pleading and a response to
24 Zorts’ motion to compel arbitration. [ECF Nos. 16; 19].
25
4.
Reynolds timely filed his motion to dismiss and his opposition to Zorts’ motion to
26 compel arbitration. [ECF Nos. 23; 25].
27
5.
On November 5, 2024, the Parties stipulated and the Court ordered that Zorts could
28 obtain an extension of time until November 27, 2024, to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss,
1 and a reply in support of the motion to compel arbitration. Reynolds’ reply to the motion to dismiss
2 would then be due on December 18, 2024. [ECF Nos. 29; 30].
3
6.
Given multiple pending deadlines in other matters, and the upcoming holidays, the
4 Parties met and conferred and agreed to extend the following deadlines.
5
Deadline
Current Date
Proposed New Date
6
Zorts’ Opposition to
November 27, 2024
December 11, 2024
7
Reynolds’ Motion to Dismiss
8
Zorts Reply in support of
November 27, 2024
December 11, 2024
9
Motion to Compel Arbitration
10
Reynolds’ Reply in support of
December 18, 2024
January 15, 2025
11
Motion to Dismiss
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
2
1
The Parties do not seek this extension for purposes of delay, and this is the second request
2 for an extension of time on these briefs.
3
DATED this 25th day of November, 2024.
DATED this 25th day of November, 2024.
4
McDONALD CARANO LLP
KEMP JONES, LLP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
By: /s/ Rory T. Kay
Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221)
Katrina E. Weil (NSBN 16152)
2300 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
rkay@mcdonaldcarano.com
jfortin@mcdonaldcarano.com
kweil@mcdonaldcarano.com
By: /s/ Mona Kaveh
Nathanael R. Rulis, Esq. (NSBN 11259)
Mona Kaveh, Esq. (NSBN 11825)
Joseph D. Laurita, Esq. (NSBN 16267)
KEMP JONES, LLP
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 17th
Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
n.rulis@kempjones.com
m.kaveh@kempjones.com
j.laurita@kempjones.com
Attorneys for App-Order LLC dba Zorts
Sports
Megan S. Wright, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Nathan T. Heimes, Esq. (pro hac vice)
CLINE WILLIAMS WRIGHT
JOHNSON
& OLDFATHER, L.L.P.
12910 Pierce Street, Street 200
Omaha, Nebraska 68144
mwright@clinewilliams.com
nheimes@clinewilliams.com
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
17
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED:
______ _____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
Dated:
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
November 25, 2024
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?