Pyshenkina v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office

Filing 8

ORDER. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 1 . Plaintiff has since paid the filing fee, Docket No. 6 , so the Court DENIES as moot the application to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of that ruling, the Court also INSTRUCTS the Clerk's Office to file the complaint (Docket No. 1 ) on the docket and to issue summonses to each Defendant. Plaintiff must promptly serve Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/28/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

LIUDMILA PYSHENKINA,

Case No. 2:24-cv-01518-NJK

Plaintiff(s),

ORDER

v.

[Docket No. 1]

USCIS LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE,
et al.,
Defendant(s).

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket

13 No. 1. Plaintiff has since paid the filing fee, Docket No. 6, so the Court DENIES as moot the
14 application to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of that ruling, the Court also INSTRUCTS the
15 Clerk’s Office to file the complaint (Docket No. 1) on the docket and to issue summonses to each
16 Defendant. Plaintiff must promptly serve Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

Dated: August 28, 2024

19

______________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1