State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Spacom, L.L.C.

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Stipulation TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (SECOND REQUEST). IT IS SO ORDERED that the discovery deadlines be extended as follows: Discovery due by 7/15/2025. Motions due by 8/12/2025. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/12/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/5/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 George F. Hand, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8483 2 ghand@handsullivan.com Samantha A. Herbeck, Esq. 3 Nevada Bar No. 14542 sherbeck@handsullivan.com 4 HAND & SULLIVAN, LLC 3442 North Buffalo Drive 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 Telephone: (702) 656-5814 6 Facsimile: (702) 656-9820 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY as 8 Subrogee of THOR JORGENSEN 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY 12 COMPANY as Subrogee of THOR JORGENSEN, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-01543-CDS-BNW STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (SECOND REQUEST) 16 SPACOM, L.L.C. dba BATCADDY LLC, a foreign limited liability company; DOES I - v, 17 inclusive; ROE CORPORATIONS I - V, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Pursuant to LR IA6-1(a), LR IA 6-2, and LR 26-3, Plaintiff STATE FARM FIRE AND 22 CASUALTY COMPANY, as Subrogee of THOR JORGENSEN, by and through its counsel of 23 record George F. Hand, Esq. and Samantha A. Herbeck, Esq., from the law firm of HAND & 24 SULLIVAN, LLC and Defendant SPACOM, LLC., by and through its attorney of record Richard 25 Waltjen, Esq. from the law firm of PYATT SILVESTRI (collectively referred to as the “Parties”), 26 hereby stipulate and agree to extend the Discovery Deadlines in the current Discovery Plan and 27 Scheduling Order in this matter for a period of 60 days. 28 / / / 1 A. DISCOVERY COMPLETED 2 1. Plaintiff has made initial disclosures of witnesses and documents; 3 2. Defendant has made initial disclosures of witnesses and documents; 4 3. Plaintiff has made supplemental disclosures of witnesses and documents; 5 4. Defendant has made supplemental disclosure of witnesses and documents; 6 5. Plaintiff has made their first set of interrogatories to Defendants; 7 6. Plaintiff has made their first set of requests for production of documents to Defendants; 8 9 7. Defendant has made their responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories; 10 8. Defendant has made their responses to Plaintiff’s first set of requests for production of documents; 11 12 9. Defendant has made their first set of interrogatories to Plaintiff; 13 10. Defendant has made their first set of requests for production of documents to Plaintiff; 14 15 11. Defendant has made their first of requests for admissions to Plaintiff; 16 12. Defendant has made their second set of requests for production of documents to Plaintiff; 17 13. 18 and 19 14. 20 Plaintiff has made their responses to Defendants first set of requests for production of documents; 21 22 Plaintiff has made their responses to Defendants first set of interrogatories; B. DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED 23 1. Plaintiffs responses to Defendants first set of requests for admissions. 24 2. Plaintiffs responses to Defendants second set of requests for production of documents. 25 26 3. March 11, 2025. 27 28 The deposition of Defendant's 30(b)(6) Witness is currently scheduled for 4. The deposition of Thor Jorgensen. 2 1 5. The deposition of Jette Jorgensen. 2 6. The deposition of Plaintiffs 30(b)(6) Witness. 3 7. Additional Depositions, including expert depositions, remain to be completed by both parties 4 5 8. Additional Written Discovery remains to be completed by both parties. 6 9. Initial and Rebuttal Expert disclosures remain to be completed by both parties. 7 10. 8 Other further appropriate discovery may also be necessary. 9 C. REASONS WHY DISCOVERY REMAINING WAS NOT COMPLETED 10 The parties have been working diligently to complete discovery; however, due to the 11 scheduling of depositions, other discovery has been delayed. Thus, although the parties have made 12 every effort to cooperate throughout the process, they nonetheless will be unable to complete 13 discovery before the current deadlines expire. 14 The proposed extension will provide the parties with the time needed to complete the 15 remaining discovery necessary for the parties’ claims and defenses. 16 This Request is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. Rather, it is 17 sought by the parties for the purpose of conducting all necessary discovery. 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 3 1 D. DISCOVERY DEADLINES Current Joint Proposed Amended 1. Close of Discovery 05/16/2025 07/15/2025 2. Final Dates for Expert Disclosures 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (a) Initial Disclosures 03/17/2025 05/16/2025 (b) Rebuttal Disclosures 04/15/2025 06/13/2025 3. Dispositive Motions 06/13/2025 08/12/2025 4. Pretrial Order 07/15/2025 11/12/2025 9 10 HAND & SULLIVAN, LLC PYATT SILVESTRI 11 Dated: March 3, 2025 Dated: March 3, 2025 12 /s/ George F. Hand George F. Hand, Esq. (#8483) 13 Samantha A. Herbeck, Esq. (#14542) 3442 North Buffalo Drive 14 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 /s/ Richard Waltjen James P.C. Silvestri, Esq (#3603) Richard Waltjen, Esq. (#13416) 7670 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Attorneys for Defendant 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 ORDER 2 Upon Stipulation of the parties; 3 IT IS SO ORDERED that the discovery deadlines be extended as follows: 4 1. Close of Discovery 07/15/2025 5 2. Final Dates for Expert Disclosures 6 (a) Initial Disclosures 05/16/2025 7 (b) Rebuttal Disclosures 06/13/2025 8 3. Dispositive Motions 08/12/2025 9 4. Pretrial Order 11/12/2025 10 11 5 day of _______________, Dated this ___ 2025. March 12 13 14 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of March, 2025. 16 HAND & SULLIVAN, LLC 17 /s/ George F. Hand George F. Hand, Esq. 18 Nevada Bar No. 8483 Samantha A. Herbeck, Esq. 19 Nevada Bar No. 14542 3442 N. Buffalo Drive 20 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 Attorneys for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Juliana Cerriteno From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Richard Waltjen <rwaltjen@pyattsilvestri.com> Friday, February 28, 2025 7:40 AM Juliana Cerriteno George Hand; Samantha Herbeck; Michelle Mockbee RE: State Farm v Spacom - 2:24-cv-01543 - H&S File No.: 5221.080 Good morning, I reviewed the Second SAO to Extend Discovery Deadlines. You have my authorization to use my esignature. Thanks Richard Waltjen Associate Attorney 7670 Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Telephone: (702) 383-6000 Facsimile: (702) 477-0088 rwaltjen@pyattsilvestri.com www.pyattsilvestri.com The information contained in this communication may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended only for the recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately advise the sender and delete the original and any copies from your computer system. From: Juliana Cerriteno <Julianac@handsullivan.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 4:31 PM To: Richard Waltjen <rwaltjen@pyattsilvestri.com> Cc: George Hand <ghand@handsullivan.com>; Samantha Herbeck <sherbeck@handsullivan.com>; Michelle Mockbee <mmockbee@pyattsilvestri.com> Subject: State Farm v Spacom - 2:24-cv-01543 - H&S File No.: 5221.080 sophosp sm artbannerend Good Afternoon Mr. Waltjen, Attached please find draft of SAO to Extend Discovery Deadlines for your review. If you have any requested revisions please use redlines, if none please confirm we have authority to affix your e-signature to the SAO for submission to the court. Thank you. Sincerely, Juliana Cerriteno, Paralegal Hand & Sullivan, LLC Julianac@handsullivan.com 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?