Otero v. Reubart et al

Filing 4

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Application to Proceed in Forma (ECF No. 1 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to separately file the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 -1 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 2 ) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent the petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent th e petitioner, because of a conflict of interest or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. In either case, counsel will represent the petitioner in all federal court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically serve upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 -1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FPD will hav e 30 days from the date of this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent the petitioner in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron Ford, Attorney Gene ral of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic Filing to the office of the Attorney General only. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that the respondents will have 30 days from the date of this order to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition at this time. Clerk status check on 10/23/2024. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/24/2024. Attorney Law Library - Florence McClure WCC terminated. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TERESA SUE OTERO, Case No. 2:24-cv-01725-RFB-EJY Petitioner, ORDER v. WILLIAM REUBART, et al., Respondents. 10 11 This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by Teresa 12 Sue Otero, an individual incarcerated at Nevada’s Florence McClure Women’s Correctional 13 Center. On September 16, 2024, the Court received from Otero an Application to Proceed in Forma 14 Pauperis (ECF No. 1), a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1), and a Motion 15 for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 2). 16 The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 3) is incomplete in that it does 17 not include the required financial certificate signed by a prison officer. See Local Rule LSR 1-2. 18 Therefore, the application will be denied. The Court will, however, suspend the matter of payment 19 of the filing fee. The Court will set a deadline for Otero to pay the filing fee or file a new in forma 20 pauperis application after counsel appears on her behalf. 21 Prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel unless the 22 circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due process violations. 23 Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 24 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam)). The court may, however, appoint counsel at any stage of the 25 proceedings if the interests of justice so require. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 8(c), Rules 26 Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. Otero’s filings indicate that this action may 27 be complex and that Otero will not be able to litigate this action pro se. The Court finds that 28 1 1 appointment of counsel is in the interests of justice. The Court will grant Otero’s Motion for 2 Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 2). 3 The Court has examined Otero’s habeas petition, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 4 Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts and determines that it merits service upon 5 the respondents. The Court will order the petition served upon the respondents, and will direct the 6 respondents to appear, but will not require any further action on their part at this time. 7 8 9 10 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Application to Proceed in Forma (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to separately file the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1). 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF 12 No. 2) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed 13 to represent the petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent the petitioner, because of a conflict of 14 interest or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. In either case, counsel will 15 represent the petitioner in all federal court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to 16 withdraw. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically 18 serve upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 Corpus (ECF No. 1-1). 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FPD will have 30 days from the date of this order 21 to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent the petitioner in 22 this case. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron Ford, 24 Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents 25 an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic 26 Filing to the office of the Attorney General only. 27 28 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondents will have 30 days from the date of this 2 order to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition 3 at this time. 4 5 DATED: September 23, 2024. 6 7 8 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?