Steele v. Clark County School District
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation to Vacate. The motion hearing set for December 3, 2024 at 2:30 p.m. is vacated and reset to February 3, 2025 at 1:30pm. 5 Motion Hearing set for 2/3/2025 at 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
5
JACQUELINE V. NICHOLS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14246
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
300 So. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 577-9300
Direct: (702) 577-9315
Facsimile: (702) 255-2858
E-Mail: jnichols@grsm.com
6
Attorneys for Clark County School District
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101
10
BOBBY STEELE, as parent of and on behalf of
C.S., a minor,
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01869-JAD-MDC
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING
vs.
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political
subdivision of the State of Nevada, and DOES I
through X, and ROE CORPORATIONS,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Defendant CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (“CCSD”), by and through its
18
counsel, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP, and Plaintiff BOBBY STEELE, as
19
parent of and on behalf of C.S., a minor (“Plaintiff”) by and through her counsel, Scott
20
Whitworth, Esq. and Sam Castor, Esq. of LEX TECNICA, LTD., hereby agree and submit the
21
following stipulation.
22
23
24
1. The Court scheduled a hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal for
December 3, 2024 at 2:30 P.M. on a stack. ECF No. 7
2. Counsel for Defendant was recently retained to defend an individual in relation to an
25
evidentiary hearing held by the Nevada Commission for Common Interest Communities
26
and Condominium Hotels (the “Commission”).
27
3. Prior to counsel for Defendant’s retention, the Commission had previously granted an
28
extension on the evidentiary hearing and continued the hearing to December 3, 2024.
-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101
10
11
12
13
4. After counsel for Defendant’s retention, a request was made to the Commission to
continue the evidentiary hearing, but the Commission denied the hearing due to the
allegations and the prior extension.
5. Counsel for Defendant recently transitioned to a new firm and no other attorney within
the firm is familiar with Defendant or has previously represented Defendant.
6. Additionally, the parties have several conflicts throughout December and January,
preventing an immediate rescheduling of the hearing, including the holidays, mediations,
and multi-day evidentiary hearings.
7. Accordingly, the parties agree to VACATE the currently scheduled hearing on December
3, 2024 and request that the Court schedule the hearing for a date in February or at a time
convenient for the Court.
8. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
DATED this 25th day of November 2024.
DATED this 25th day of November 2024.
GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP
LEX TECNICA, LTD
/s/ Jacqueline V. Nichols
Jacqueline V. Nichols, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14246
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Defendant,
Clark County School District
/s/ Scott Whitworth
Erven T. Nelson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 2332
Michael Falater, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12366
Scott Whitworth, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 15671
Vincent Garrido, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 15918
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Bobby Steele, as parent of and on behalf of
C.S., a minor
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
The motion hearing set for December 3,
24 2024 at 2:30 p.m. is vacated and reset
to February 3, 2025 at 1:30pm.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
11/25/2024
DATED: _______________________________
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?