G.P. et al v. Best Buy Co. Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation to Extend Case Management Deadlines. Discovery due by 5/8/2025. Motions due by 6/9/2025. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/9/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/28/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
G.P., et al.,
Case No. 2:24-cv-01892-JAD-NJK
Plaintiffs,
Order
v.
[Docket No. 24]
BEST BUY CO. INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend case management deadlines by 30 days.
10 Docket No. 24.
11
A request to extend unexpired deadlines in the scheduling order must be premised on a
12 showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Local Rule 26-3. The good cause analysis turns
13 on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence.
14 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). “The diligence
15 obligation is ongoing.” Morgal v. Maricopa Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 284 F.R.D. 452, 460 (D.
16 Ariz. 2012). The showing of diligence is measured by the conduct displayed throughout the entire
17 period of time already allowed. See Muniz v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 731 F.Supp.2d 961, 967
18 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (quoting Jackson v. Laureate, Inc., 186 F.R.D. 605, 607 (E.D. Cal. 1999)). That
19 a request is jointly submitted “neither mandates allowance of the extension sought nor exempts
20 parties from making the necessary showings to justify that relief. Failure to provide such showings
21 may result in denial of a stipulated request to extend the case management deadlines.” Williams
22 v. James River Grp. Inc., 627 F. Supp. 3d 1172, 1178 (D. Nev. 2022).
23
A request to extend case management deadlines must provide a “statement specifying the
24 discovery completed.” Local Rule 26-3. To allow the Court to make a proper determination of
25 whether the parties have been diligent throughout the discovery period, this statement must include
26 the dates on which all discovery occurred. Such information is absent here. See Docket No. 24 at
27 2. Additionally, the parties do not provide a specific description of the discovery that remains to
28 be completed, see Local Rule 26-3(b). Docket No. 24 at 2.
1
1
Further, the parties seek relief to “explore the potential to mediate this matter once
2 additional discovery has been completed.” Docket No. 24 at 3. Settlement discussions are a
3 common aspect of federal litigation and it is well-settled that the existence of such discussions is
4 not good cause to modify the scheduling order. Williams 627 F. Supp. 3d at 1181. Nonetheless,
5 relief may be afforded in appropriate cases when, inter alia, a firm mediation date is set in the
6 near term, avoiding costs in the interim is likely to foster resolution at the mediation, and
7 resolution at the mediation is likely. See id. at 1181 n.8. The Court is not inclined to modify the
8 case management schedule simply because settlement is being discussed. On the other hand, good
9 cause might exist if a mediation is set for the near future and the other circumstances favor relief.
10 See id.
11
However, the stipulation also seeks relief on the ground that one of Plaintiffs’ family
12 members recently underwent an operation, which has caused delays in Plaintiff G.P.’s deposition.
13 Docket No. 24 at 3. Therefore, as the Court sympathizes with Plaintiffs’ circumstance, the Court
14 will allow the extension. The parties must diligently conduct discovery. The Court is not inclined
15 to extend case management deadlines without a robust showing that the governing standards are
16 met.
17
Accordingly, the stipulation to extend is GRANTED. Docket No. 24.
18
Deadlines are RESET as follows:
19
•
Initial expert disclosures: March 10, 2025
20
•
Rebuttal expert disclosures: April 9, 2025
21
•
Discovery cutoff: May 8, 2025
22
•
Dispositive motions: June 9, 2025
23
•
Joint proposed pretrial order: July 9, 2025, or 30 days after resolution of dispositive
24
motions
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: January 28, 2025
______________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?