Sanchez et al v. Fashion Show Mall LLC et al
Filing
32
ORDER granting 29 Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Fashion Show Mall, LLC without prejudice. Fashion Show Mall LLC terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/7/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C.
Mark R. Smith, Esq., SBN: 11872
mrsmith@rlattorneys.com
8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Telephone: (702) 997-1696
Facsimile: (702) 702-8619
Attorneys for Defendants,
Fashion Show Mall, LLC, and
Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
Case No.: 2:24-cv-02086-APG-EJY
MARTHA DELIA MACIAS SANCHEZ, an
individual, CESAR IVAN MARQUEZ, an
individual;
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT
FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC
ONLY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC, a foreign
corporation; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR
CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; MACY’S
RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a
MACY’S INC. and DOES I through X, inclusive;
and ROE CORPORATIONS I through V, inclusive;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
Defendant FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC, by and through its counsel of record, Mark R.
Smith, Esq., of the law firm Resnick & Louis, P.C., Plaintiffs, MARTHA DELIA MACIAS
SANCHEZ and CESAR IVAN MARQUEZ, by and through their counsel of record, Tyler M.
Crawford, Esq., of the law firm of Atkinson Watkins & Hoffmann, LLP, Defendant MACY’s
RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, by and through its counsel of record, Mark R. Smith, Esq., of the law
firm Resnick & Louis, P.C., and Defendant SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, , by and
1
1
through its counsel of record, Skylar Arakawa-Pamphilon, Esq., of the law firm of Evans Fears
2
Schuttert McNulty Mickus, hereby stipulate that the above captioned action and any and all claims
3
asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC (ONLY) in this action are
4
hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
5
Each party is to bear their own attorney fees, interest, and costs.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED this 5th day of March 2025.
DATED this 5th day of March 2025.
RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C.
ATKINSON WATKINS & HOFFMANN, LLP
/s/ Mark R. Smith
/s/ Tyler M. Crawford
MARK R. SMITH, ESQ.,
Nevada Bar No.: 11872
mrsmith@rlattorneys.com
8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Telephone: (702) 997-1696
Facsimile: (702) 702-8619
Attorneys for Defendants
Fashion Show Mall, LLC, and
Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC
TYLER M. CRAWFORD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 10559
tcrawford@awhlawyers.com
10789 W. Twain Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: 702-562-6000
Facsimile: 702-562-6066
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Martha Delia Macias Sanchez and
Cesar Ivan Marquez
DATED this 5th day of March 2025.
EVANS FEARS SCHUTTERT MCNULTY MICKUS
/s/ Skylar Arakawa-Pamphilon
_____________________________________
SKYLAR ARAKAWA-PAMPHILON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 15864
sarakawa@efsmmlaw.com
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Telephone: (702) 805-0290
Facsimile: (702) 805-0291
Attorneys for Defendant
Schindler Elevator Corporation
///
///
///
///
28
2
1
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
2
Based upon the Parties’ foregoing stipulations, the Court hereby ORDERS that this action
3
and Plaintiff’s claims herein against Defendant FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC (ONLY), are
4
hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own attorney fees,
5
interest, and costs.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED:
8
March 7, 2025
Dated:__________________
9
10
Submitted by:
11
RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C.
12
/s/ Mark R. Smith
13
MARK R. SMITH, ESQ.,
Nevada Bar No.: 11872
mrsmith@rlattorneys.com
8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Telephone: (702) 997-1696
Facsimile: (702) 702-8619
Attorneys for Defendants
Fashion Show Mall, LLC, and
Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC
14
15
16
17
18
________________________
ANDREW P. GORDON
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?