Sanchez et al v. Fashion Show Mall LLC et al

Filing 32

ORDER granting 29 Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Fashion Show Mall, LLC without prejudice. Fashion Show Mall LLC terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/7/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. Mark R. Smith, Esq., SBN: 11872 mrsmith@rlattorneys.com 8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Telephone: (702) 997-1696 Facsimile: (702) 702-8619 Attorneys for Defendants, Fashion Show Mall, LLC, and Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 Case No.: 2:24-cv-02086-APG-EJY MARTHA DELIA MACIAS SANCHEZ, an individual, CESAR IVAN MARQUEZ, an individual; 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC ONLY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC, a foreign corporation; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; MACY’S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a MACY’S INC. and DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through V, inclusive; 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. Defendant FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC, by and through its counsel of record, Mark R. Smith, Esq., of the law firm Resnick & Louis, P.C., Plaintiffs, MARTHA DELIA MACIAS SANCHEZ and CESAR IVAN MARQUEZ, by and through their counsel of record, Tyler M. Crawford, Esq., of the law firm of Atkinson Watkins & Hoffmann, LLP, Defendant MACY’s RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, by and through its counsel of record, Mark R. Smith, Esq., of the law firm Resnick & Louis, P.C., and Defendant SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, , by and 1 1 through its counsel of record, Skylar Arakawa-Pamphilon, Esq., of the law firm of Evans Fears 2 Schuttert McNulty Mickus, hereby stipulate that the above captioned action and any and all claims 3 asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC (ONLY) in this action are 4 hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5 Each party is to bear their own attorney fees, interest, and costs. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED this 5th day of March 2025. DATED this 5th day of March 2025. RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. ATKINSON WATKINS & HOFFMANN, LLP /s/ Mark R. Smith /s/ Tyler M. Crawford MARK R. SMITH, ESQ., Nevada Bar No.: 11872 mrsmith@rlattorneys.com 8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Telephone: (702) 997-1696 Facsimile: (702) 702-8619 Attorneys for Defendants Fashion Show Mall, LLC, and Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC TYLER M. CRAWFORD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 10559 tcrawford@awhlawyers.com 10789 W. Twain Avenue, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Telephone: 702-562-6000 Facsimile: 702-562-6066 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Martha Delia Macias Sanchez and Cesar Ivan Marquez DATED this 5th day of March 2025. EVANS FEARS SCHUTTERT MCNULTY MICKUS /s/ Skylar Arakawa-Pamphilon _____________________________________ SKYLAR ARAKAWA-PAMPHILON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 15864 sarakawa@efsmmlaw.com 6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Telephone: (702) 805-0290 Facsimile: (702) 805-0291 Attorneys for Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation /// /// /// /// 28 2 1 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 2 Based upon the Parties’ foregoing stipulations, the Court hereby ORDERS that this action 3 and Plaintiff’s claims herein against Defendant FASHION SHOW MALL, LLC (ONLY), are 4 hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own attorney fees, 5 interest, and costs. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED: 8 March 7, 2025 Dated:__________________ 9 10 Submitted by: 11 RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. 12 /s/ Mark R. Smith 13 MARK R. SMITH, ESQ., Nevada Bar No.: 11872 mrsmith@rlattorneys.com 8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Telephone: (702) 997-1696 Facsimile: (702) 702-8619 Attorneys for Defendants Fashion Show Mall, LLC, and Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 ________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?