Maya v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that if Defendant seeks a stay of discovery, a separate request with robust discussion of the governing standards must be filed by 3/10/2025. If such a motion is not filed, the parties must file a joint proposed discovery plan by 3/17/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/3/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7

RUBEN MAYA,

8

Plaintiff(s),

Case No. 2:24-cv-02388-GMN-NJK
Order

9

v.

10

CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.,

11

Defendant(s).

12

To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-

13 1(a). Although a motion to compel arbitration was filed, Docket No. 6, Defendant has not to date
14 filed a separate motion to stay discovery pending resolution of that motion, see Arik v. Meyers,
15 2020 WL 515843, at *1-2 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2020) (identifying governing standards).1 If Defendant
16 seeks a stay of discovery, a separate request with robust discussion of the governing standards
17 must be filed by March 10, 2025. If such a motion is not filed, the parties must file a joint proposed
18 discovery plan by March 17, 2025.
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

Dated: March 3, 2025

21

______________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27

1

Some portions of the underlying motion practice may touch on these issues, see Docket
No. 6 at 9-10, but a separate motion specific to this request for relief has not been filed, cf. Local
28 Rule IC 2-2(b).
1