Miller v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
13
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting 12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/21/2025. Motions by 8/20/2025. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 9/19/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/10/2025. NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC § 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Ju dge" form on the Court's website - www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form has been sent to parties not receiving electronic service.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KRISTOPHER M. HELMICK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13348
KIRILL V. MIKHAYLOV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13538
PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW
8180 Rafael Rivera Way #200
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Phone: (702) 602-4878
Fax: (702) 665-5627
Kris@PacificWestInjury.com
Kirill@PacificWestInjury.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
SHEILA MILLER, individually,
11
CASE NO.:
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY
STORES, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation;
GRANT THORNTON, LLP, a Foreign
Limited-Liability Partnership; and DOES I-X;
and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES XI-XX,
inclusive.
14
15
16
2:24-cv-02410
STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN AND
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER
SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH
LOCAL RULE 26-1
Defendants
17
18
PLAINTIFF SHEILA MILLER, by and through her counsel of record, KIRILL V.
19
MIKHAYLOV, ESQ. of PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW, and Defendant, LOVE’S TRAVEL
20
STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC., by and through its counsel CARISSA YUHAS of RESNICK
21
& LOUIS, P.C., c conducted the initial case conference required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), and
22
the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and submit
23
the following discovery plan:
24
I.
FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a) INITIAL DISCLOSURE
25
Parties have agreed to exchange initial disclosures no later than March 19, 2025, which is 14
26
days after the Rule 26 Conference was held. The parties expressly agree any document productions
27
shall be bates-stamped with the parties’ respective identifying bates system. Other than this, no
28
changes are necessary in the form or requirement for disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a).
Page 1 of 5
1
II.
ESTIMATE OF TIME REQUIRED FOR DISCOVERY
2
A.
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE
3
Discovery will take 180 days from January 22, 2025, which is the date Defendants filed
4
their Answer, the first responsive pleading. Accordingly, all discovery must be completed no later
5
than July 21, 2025. The parties may conduct discovery within the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b).
6
Subject to the foregoing, discovery need not be limited or focused on particular issues or conducted
7
in phases.
8
B.
9
Unless stated herein or ordered by the Court, the date for filing motions to amend the
10
pleadings or to add parties shall not be later than 90 days prior to the discovery cut-off date, and
11
therefore not later than April 22, 2025.
AMENDING THE PLEADINGS AND ADDING PARTIES
12
C.
13
In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), disclosures identifying experts shall be made 60
14
days prior to the discovery cut-off date, and therefore not later than May 22, 2025, and disclosures of
15
rebuttal experts shall be made 30 days after the initial disclosure of experts, and therefore not later
16
than June 20, 2025.
17
D.
18
The parties shall file dispositive motions 30 days after the discovery cut-off date, and therefore
19
FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2) DISCLOSURES (EXPERTS)
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
not later than August 20, 2025.
20
E.
PRETRIAL ORDER
21
If no dispositive motions are filed, and unless otherwise ordered by this Court, the Joint
22
Pretrial Order shall be filed 30 days after the date set for filing dispositive motions, and therefore not
23
later than September 19, 2025. In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the
24
Joint Pretrial Order shall be suspended until 30 days after the Court enters a ruling on the
25
dispositive motions, or otherwise by further order of the Court. The disclosures required by Fed.
26
R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3), and any objections thereto, shall be included in the Joint Pretrial Order.
27
///
28
///
Page 2 of 5
1
F.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
2
The parties certify that they met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative
3
dispute-resolution processes including mediation, arbitration, and if applicable, early neutral
4
evaluation.
5
G.
6
The parties certify that they considered consenting to trial by a magistrate judge and use of
7
ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF CASE DISPOSITION
the Short Trial Program.
H.
8
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
9
1. Electronically Stored Information and Electronic Service of Discovery
10
The parties have discussed the retention and production of electronic data. The parties consent
11
to electronic service of any and all discovery documents. Said service shall be deemed completed by
12
sending an email with the related discovery document(s) to all service addresses for counsel and
13
counsel’s staff on record with the court for the above-captioned matter at the time of service. The
14
parties further agree, when serving by email, if any error or delayed delivery message is received by
15
the sending party, that party shall promptly (within one business day of receipt of such message) notify
16
the intended recipient(s) of the message and serve the pleading or other papers by other authorized
17
means. This consent does not preclude counsel from serving discovery documents by mail in
18
accordance with Fed. R. Civ. 5(b), including service of electronic files copied to compact disc or
19
similar storage media. Whether served by e-mail or by mail, three additional days shall be added to
20
the timeline within which to respond, as provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). To the extent discovery
21
requests are served on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, service will be deemed effective on the
22
next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
The parties reserve the right to revisit this issue if a dispute or need arises.
23
2. Electronic Evidence Conference Certification
24
25
The parties further intend to present evidence in electronic format to jurors for the purposes of
26
jury deliberations. The parties discussed the presentation of evidence for juror deliberations, but did
27
not reach any stipulations as to that method as this early stage.
28
///
Page 3 of 5
III.
1
EXTENSIONS OR MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISCOVERY PLAN AND
SCHEDULING ORDER
2
3
LR 26-3 governs modifications or extensions to this discovery plan and scheduling order.
4
IV.
PROVIDING “SHELLS” OR WORD VERSIONS TO OPPOSING COUNSEL
FOR ALL WRITTEN DISCOVERY PROPOUNDED
5
6
The parties agree that for each set of written discovery propounded upon the other, an
7
accompanying “word” or “word perfect” version of said discovery set shall be provided in order to
8
reduce the time and effort in having to type out the requests or interrogatories. The failure to do so
9
does not deem service of the written discovery ineffective.
10
V.
PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED/TRIAL PREPARATION MATERIAL
11
If a party discovers it has inadvertently disclosed privileged or trial preparation material, it
12
agrees to notify the opposing party in writing within 30 days of the discovery that such document(s)
13
have been disclosed, which written notification will set forth the basis for the claim that the items
14
disclosed are privileged or trial preparation material. If the party receiving the disclosure agrees that
15
the inadvertently-produced items are privileged or trial preparation material, it will return all such
16
items to the producing party without the retention of any copies. If the receiving party disputes that
17
the items are privileged or trial preparation materials, it will within 30 days of written notification of
18
the inadvertent disclosure, present the disputed items inadvertently disclosed to the court under seal
19
for a decision with respect thereto (without the retention of copies), including with such submission
20
the producing party’s written notification and any statement the receiving party wishes to make in
21
support of its position that the items are not privileged or trial preparation material.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
Page 4 of 5
1
If the receiving party disclosed the inadvertently-produced privileged or trial preparation materials
2
before being notified of the inadvertent disclosure, it will take reasonable steps to retrieve the materials
3
pending resolution of the matter.
4
DATED this 7th day of March, 2025.
DATED this 7th day of March, 2025.
5
PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW
RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C.
__/s/ Kirill V. Mikhaylov
_____
KRISTOPHER M. HELMICK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13348
KIRILL V. MIKHAYLOV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13538
BOHDEN G. COLE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 15719
8180 Rafael Rivera Way #200
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Attorneys for Plaintiff
___/s/ Carissa Yuhas____________
CARISSA YUHAS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14692
8945 West Russell Road, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Attorneys for Defendants
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
_________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED: March 10, 2025
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 5 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?