Miller v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 13

SCHEDULING ORDER Granting 12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/21/2025. Motions by 8/20/2025. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 9/19/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/10/2025. NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC § 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Ju dge" form on the Court's website - www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form has been sent to parties not receiving electronic service.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KRISTOPHER M. HELMICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13348 KIRILL V. MIKHAYLOV, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13538 PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW 8180 Rafael Rivera Way #200 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Phone: (702) 602-4878 Fax: (702) 665-5627 Kris@PacificWestInjury.com Kirill@PacificWestInjury.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 SHEILA MILLER, individually, 11 CASE NO.: Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation; GRANT THORNTON, LLP, a Foreign Limited-Liability Partnership; and DOES I-X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES XI-XX, inclusive. 14 15 16 2:24-cv-02410 STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 26-1 Defendants 17 18 PLAINTIFF SHEILA MILLER, by and through her counsel of record, KIRILL V. 19 MIKHAYLOV, ESQ. of PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW, and Defendant, LOVE’S TRAVEL 20 STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC., by and through its counsel CARISSA YUHAS of RESNICK 21 & LOUIS, P.C., c conducted the initial case conference required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), and 22 the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and submit 23 the following discovery plan: 24 I. FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a) INITIAL DISCLOSURE 25 Parties have agreed to exchange initial disclosures no later than March 19, 2025, which is 14 26 days after the Rule 26 Conference was held. The parties expressly agree any document productions 27 shall be bates-stamped with the parties’ respective identifying bates system. Other than this, no 28 changes are necessary in the form or requirement for disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a). Page 1 of 5 1 II. ESTIMATE OF TIME REQUIRED FOR DISCOVERY 2 A. DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE 3 Discovery will take 180 days from January 22, 2025, which is the date Defendants filed 4 their Answer, the first responsive pleading. Accordingly, all discovery must be completed no later 5 than July 21, 2025. The parties may conduct discovery within the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). 6 Subject to the foregoing, discovery need not be limited or focused on particular issues or conducted 7 in phases. 8 B. 9 Unless stated herein or ordered by the Court, the date for filing motions to amend the 10 pleadings or to add parties shall not be later than 90 days prior to the discovery cut-off date, and 11 therefore not later than April 22, 2025. AMENDING THE PLEADINGS AND ADDING PARTIES 12 C. 13 In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), disclosures identifying experts shall be made 60 14 days prior to the discovery cut-off date, and therefore not later than May 22, 2025, and disclosures of 15 rebuttal experts shall be made 30 days after the initial disclosure of experts, and therefore not later 16 than June 20, 2025. 17 D. 18 The parties shall file dispositive motions 30 days after the discovery cut-off date, and therefore 19 FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2) DISCLOSURES (EXPERTS) DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS not later than August 20, 2025. 20 E. PRETRIAL ORDER 21 If no dispositive motions are filed, and unless otherwise ordered by this Court, the Joint 22 Pretrial Order shall be filed 30 days after the date set for filing dispositive motions, and therefore not 23 later than September 19, 2025. In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the 24 Joint Pretrial Order shall be suspended until 30 days after the Court enters a ruling on the 25 dispositive motions, or otherwise by further order of the Court. The disclosures required by Fed. 26 R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3), and any objections thereto, shall be included in the Joint Pretrial Order. 27 /// 28 /// Page 2 of 5 1 F. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2 The parties certify that they met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative 3 dispute-resolution processes including mediation, arbitration, and if applicable, early neutral 4 evaluation. 5 G. 6 The parties certify that they considered consenting to trial by a magistrate judge and use of 7 ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF CASE DISPOSITION the Short Trial Program. H. 8 ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE 9 1. Electronically Stored Information and Electronic Service of Discovery 10 The parties have discussed the retention and production of electronic data. The parties consent 11 to electronic service of any and all discovery documents. Said service shall be deemed completed by 12 sending an email with the related discovery document(s) to all service addresses for counsel and 13 counsel’s staff on record with the court for the above-captioned matter at the time of service. The 14 parties further agree, when serving by email, if any error or delayed delivery message is received by 15 the sending party, that party shall promptly (within one business day of receipt of such message) notify 16 the intended recipient(s) of the message and serve the pleading or other papers by other authorized 17 means. This consent does not preclude counsel from serving discovery documents by mail in 18 accordance with Fed. R. Civ. 5(b), including service of electronic files copied to compact disc or 19 similar storage media. Whether served by e-mail or by mail, three additional days shall be added to 20 the timeline within which to respond, as provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). To the extent discovery 21 requests are served on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, service will be deemed effective on the 22 next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The parties reserve the right to revisit this issue if a dispute or need arises. 23 2. Electronic Evidence Conference Certification 24 25 The parties further intend to present evidence in electronic format to jurors for the purposes of 26 jury deliberations. The parties discussed the presentation of evidence for juror deliberations, but did 27 not reach any stipulations as to that method as this early stage. 28 /// Page 3 of 5 III. 1 EXTENSIONS OR MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER 2 3 LR 26-3 governs modifications or extensions to this discovery plan and scheduling order. 4 IV. PROVIDING “SHELLS” OR WORD VERSIONS TO OPPOSING COUNSEL FOR ALL WRITTEN DISCOVERY PROPOUNDED 5 6 The parties agree that for each set of written discovery propounded upon the other, an 7 accompanying “word” or “word perfect” version of said discovery set shall be provided in order to 8 reduce the time and effort in having to type out the requests or interrogatories. The failure to do so 9 does not deem service of the written discovery ineffective. 10 V. PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED/TRIAL PREPARATION MATERIAL 11 If a party discovers it has inadvertently disclosed privileged or trial preparation material, it 12 agrees to notify the opposing party in writing within 30 days of the discovery that such document(s) 13 have been disclosed, which written notification will set forth the basis for the claim that the items 14 disclosed are privileged or trial preparation material. If the party receiving the disclosure agrees that 15 the inadvertently-produced items are privileged or trial preparation material, it will return all such 16 items to the producing party without the retention of any copies. If the receiving party disputes that 17 the items are privileged or trial preparation materials, it will within 30 days of written notification of 18 the inadvertent disclosure, present the disputed items inadvertently disclosed to the court under seal 19 for a decision with respect thereto (without the retention of copies), including with such submission 20 the producing party’s written notification and any statement the receiving party wishes to make in 21 support of its position that the items are not privileged or trial preparation material. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 5 1 If the receiving party disclosed the inadvertently-produced privileged or trial preparation materials 2 before being notified of the inadvertent disclosure, it will take reasonable steps to retrieve the materials 3 pending resolution of the matter. 4 DATED this 7th day of March, 2025. DATED this 7th day of March, 2025. 5 PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. __/s/ Kirill V. Mikhaylov _____ KRISTOPHER M. HELMICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13348 KIRILL V. MIKHAYLOV, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13538 BOHDEN G. COLE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15719 8180 Rafael Rivera Way #200 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Attorneys for Plaintiff ___/s/ Carissa Yuhas____________ CARISSA YUHAS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14692 8945 West Russell Road, Suite 330 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 _________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: March 10, 2025 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?