Edelstein v. Nelson

Filing 20

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties will appear in person for an evidentiary hearing and a hearing on the 18 motion to dismiss at 9:00 a.m. on March 24, 2025, in Courtroom 3B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court sua sponte shortens the briefi ng schedule for the pending Motion as follows: any opposition is due March 18, 2025 and any reply , which is optional, is due by 5:00 p.m., on March 21, 2025. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall blindly file a pre-hearing memorandum setting forth the parties' legal and factual arguments by 5:00 p.m., March 21, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by 10:00 a.m., March 21, 2025, counsel must deliver to the chambers of the undersigned judge on the 4th Floor (Suite 4 068) one copy of their exhibits in a three-ring binder for the Court's use. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 3/11/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 Alexis Edelstein, 2:25-cv-00003-GMN-MDC Petitioner, ORDER SETTING A HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 18) AND AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING vs. Tara Michelle Nelson, Respondent. 9 10 The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed joint pretrial order (ECF No. 19). Petitioner 11 Alexis Edelstein seeks the return of his infant son E.E. to Argentina under the 1980 Hague Convention 12 on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Hague Convention”) and the International Child 13 Abduction Remedies Acts at 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601-11610 (“ICARA”). The Hague Convention requires 14 the expeditious handling of proceedings for the return of minor children. 15 IT IS ORDERED that: 16 1. The parties will appear in person for an evidentiary hearing and a hearing on the Motion to 17 Dismiss (“Motion”)(ECF No. 18) at 9:00 a.m. on March 24, 2025, in Courtroom 3B. The 18 parties’ estimate one (1) day for the evidentiary hearing and shall manage the presentation of 19 evidence, including any witnesses, accordingly. 20 2. The Court sua sponte SHORTENS the briefing schedule for the pending Motion as follows: 21 any opposition is due March 18, 2025 and any reply, which is optional, is due by 5:00 p.m., 22 on March 21, 2025. 23 3. Each party shall blindly file a pre-hearing Memorandum setting forth the parties’ legal and 24 factual arguments by 5:00 p.m., March 21, 2024. The Memorandums shall address the 25 1 1 issues identified at Section V of the parties’ Joint Pretrial Order (ECF No. 19) and must not 2 be longer than 5 pages. 3 4. By 10:00 a.m., March 21, 2024, counsel must deliver to the chambers of the undersigned 4 judge on the 4th Floor (Suite 4068) one copy of their exhibits in a three-ring binder for the 5 Court’s use. Counsel shall deliver (a) the original and two copies of a complete list of 6 exhibits that will be offered into evidence at the evidentiary hearing, and (b) the original and 7 two copies of a complete list of witnesses who will be called at the evidentiary hearing. The 8 parties must also state, as part of their complete witness list, whether each witness will be 9 appearing in-person or virtually. At the same time, each party shall serve copies of these lists 10 on all other parties. For any witnesses that are identified as appearing virtually, Courtroom 11 Deputy Tawnee Renfro will email zoom links to counsel at their email addresses of record, 12 so that counsel can circulate the links and instructions to their witnesses. 13 5. The parties are responsible for providing any necessary interpreter/s and shall arrange for any 14 such interpreter/s to be present in person at the March 24, 2025, evidentiary hearing. 15 6. All questions concerning the foregoing should be directed to Courtroom Deputy Tawnee 16 Renfro at (702) 464-5427. 17 18 Dated: March 11, 2025. 19 20 _________________________ Hon. Maximiliano D. Couvillier III United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?