Sinyard v. McMahill et al
Filing
5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Extend Time. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time ECF No. #4 is granted. Plaintiff has until April 25, 2025, to either pay the full $405 filing fee or to file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with required attachments. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 3/6/2025. (For Distribution by law library.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
DUSTIN SINYARD,
4
5
6
Case No. 2:25-cv-00055-APG-DJA
Plaintiff
ORDER
v.
KEVIN MCMAHILL, et al.,
7
Defendants
8
9
On January 14, 2025, this Court granted Plaintiff until March 14, 2025, to file a fully
10
complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3). Plaintiff seeks an
11
extension of time to comply because NDOC inmate accounting has not sent Plaintiff his
12
requested documents. (ECF No. 4). The Court grants the request for an extension of
13
time to file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis until April 25, 2025.
14
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time
15
(ECF No. 4) is granted. Plaintiff has until April 25, 2025, to either pay the full $405 filing
16
fee or to file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with required
17
attachments.
18
Plaintiff is cautioned that this action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice if
19
Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order. A dismissal without prejudice allows Plaintiff
20
to refile the case with the Court, under a new case number, when Plaintiff can file a
21
complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: March 6, 2025
___________________________________
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?