TP-Link Systems Inc. v. Shenzhen Cudy Technology CO., LTD.

Filing 26

ORDER Granting #23 Stipulation for Extension of Time (Second Request) re #6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 3/21/2025. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/5/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAEMPFER CROWELL
Robert McCoy, No. 9121
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
STEPTOE LLP
Michael J. Allan (pro hac vice)
1330 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant Shenzhen Cudy
Technology Co., Ltd.

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12

TP-LINK SYSTEMS INC.,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

SHENZHEN CUDY TECHNOLOGY
CO., LTD.,

Case No. 2:25-cv-00057-JCM-BNW
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND
TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
(SECOND REQUEST)

16
Defendant.
17
18

Plaintiff TP-Link Systems Inc. (“TP-Link”) and defendant Shenzhen

19

Cudy Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shenzhen Cudy Technology”) (collectively the

20

“parties”) stipulate that the deadline for Shenzhen Cudy Technology to respond to

21

TP-Link’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 6) be extended an additional

22

14 days until March 21, 2025 from the currently ordered deadline of March 7, 2025.

23

This is the second extension sought in connection with this deadline.

24

On Friday, February 28, new lead and local counsel for Shenzhen Cudy Technology,
3938114_1 21866.1

Page 1 of 2

1

Steptoe LLP and Kaempfer Crowell, entered appearances in this case (ECF No. 18).

2

The first such extension (ECF Nos. 15, 16) was sought by prior counsel for Shenzhen

3

Cudy Technology (ECF No. 14), who is expected to withdraw shortly.

4

Since being engaged, Shenzhen Cudy Technology’s new counsel,

5

Steptoe LLP and Kaempfer Crowell, have reached an agreement with TP-Link to

6

streamline service of process and obviate the need for TP-Link’s motion for

7

alternative service of summons and complaint (ECF No. 13). In exchange, TP-Link

8

has agreed to modify this opposition deadline to allow new counsel for Shenzhen

9

Cudy Technology sufficient time to respond to the preliminary injunction motion

10

(ECF No. 6) and develop a more fulsome preliminary injunction record. The parties

11

believe this compromise will save party and judicial resources.

12

SNELL & WILMER

KAEMPFER CROWELL

/s/ Swen Prior
Swen Prior, No. 9324
Aleem A. Dhalla, No. 14188
1700 S. Pavilion Center Dr., Ste. 210
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

Robert McCoy, No. 9121
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Kristopher L. Reed (pro hac vice)
1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attorneys for Plaintiff TP-Link
Systems Inc.

20
21

STEPTOE LLP
Michael J. Allan (pro hac vice)
1330 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Attorneys for Defendant Shenzhen Cudy
Technology Co., Ltd.
ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24

DATED:
3938114_1 21866.1

March 5, 2025

Page 2 of 2