Fewkes v. Marigold Mining Company

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request). Marigold Mining Company answer due 3/19/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 3/11/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ) Modified on 3/12/2025 (ALZ).

1
2
3
4

Patrick J. Reilly
Nevada Bar No. 6103
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.382.8135
[e-mail]

5

8

Christopher L. Ottele (appearing pro hac vice)
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
675 15th Street, Suite 2900
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

9

Attorneys for Marigold Mining Company

6

10
Attorneys at Law
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600
Las Vegas, NV 89106

B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13

DANIEL FEWKES, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

14

JAD-DJA
Case No.: 2:25-cv-00241-JCM-DJA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16

(First Request)
MARIGOLD MINING COMPANY,

17
Defendant.
18
STIPULATION

19
20

Plaintiff Daniel Fewkes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

21

(“Plaintiffs”), by and through his counsel of record, Esther C. Rodriguez, Esq., of Rodriguez Law

22

Offices, P.C., Andrew W. Dunlap, Esq., of Josephson Dunlap LLP, and Richard J. Burch, Esq. of

23

Bruckner Burch PLLC, and Defendant Marigold Mining Company (“Marigold”), by and through

24

its counsel of record, Patrick J. Reilly, Esq., of the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck,

25

LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.

26

On February 4, 2025, Plaintiffs filed their Original Class and Collective Action

27

Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (EFC No. 1) (the “Complaint”).

28

///
32807922

1

2.

2

respond to the Complaint, to allow Marigold to investigate the matter, which contains numerous

3

factual allegations.

4

3.

5

7

4.

This stipulation is brought in good faith by all parties and not for purposes of delay.

This extension will not result in any undue delay in the administration of this case.

8

Attorneys at Law
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600
Las Vegas, NV 89106

Marigold shall have up to, and including, March 19, 2025, in which to answer or

otherwise plead in response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

6

B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP

Plaintiffs have agreed to grant an extension for Marigold to answer or otherwise

5.

This is the first request for extension of time requested by the parties with respect to

9

responding to the Complaint.

10

DATED this 10th day of March, 2025.

DATED this 10th day of March, 2025.

/s/ Will Hogg ______________________
Esther C. Rodriguez, Esq.
Rodriguez Law Offices, P.C.
10161 Park Run Drive, suite 150
Las Vegas, NV 89145

/s/ Patrick J. Reilly
Patrick J. Reilly, Esq.
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600
Las Vegas, NV 89106

Andrew W. Dunlap, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Will Hogg (pro hac vice)
Josephson Dunlap LLP
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3050
Houston, TX 77046

Christopher L. Ottele (pro hac vice)
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER
SCHRECK, LLP
675 15th Street, Suite 2900
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attorneys for Marigold Mining Company

19

Richard J. Burch, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Bruckner Burch PLLC
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3025
Houston, TX 77046

20

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

21
ORDER

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

____________________________________

24
25

DANIEL
ALBREGTSDISTRICT JUDGE
UNITEDJ. STATES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26

DATED: 3/11/2025

Dated: ________________________

27
28
32807922

-2-