IN EQUITY A-3 : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. ORR WATER DITCH COMPANY

Filing 1921

DOCKET ERROR, DISREGARD ENTRY - INCORRECT CASE - WILL BE RE-DOCKETED IN SUB-CASE 3:73-CV-125 : ORDER TEMPORARILY MODIFYING WALKER RIVER DECREE RE PERMIT NO. 92107-T : (See pdf order for specifics.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND D ECREED That Permit No. 92107-T shall be administered in exactly the same fashion as theWalker Basin Conservancys previously approved Permit Nos. 80700, 88160-88162, and 90690, including use of the same river gages, and no special fees or costs ma y be assessed against NDOW for its administration. This temporary modification of the Walker River Decree will terminate when the temporary change provided for in Permit 92107-T expires and upon such termination, this Order Temporarily Modifying Walker River Decree Re Permit No. 92107-T will be, and hereby is, ipso facto deleted from the Decree without any further action by the Court. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/22/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 2/23/2023 to denote docket error (DRM).

Download PDF
Case 3:73-cv-00003-MMD Document 1921 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN EQUITY NO. C–125 4 CASE NO: 3:73–CV–00125-RJC-WGC 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE, Plaintiff - Intervenor. v. ORDER TEMPORARILY MODIFYING WALKER RIVER DECREE RE PERMIT NO. 92107-T WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, 9 a corporation, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 The Walker River Decree is hereby temporarily modified in accordance with Permit No. 13 92107-T issued by the Nevada State Engineer on January 13, 2023. 14 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED 15 that, as set forth in Nevada State Engineer Permit No. 92107-T, the Walker River Decree is hereby 16 modified to reflect the temporary changes in the manner of use and place of use to instream flow 17 for wildlife purposes in the Walker River and Walker Lake of portions of Decreed water right 18 Claim Nos. 41 and 229. The portions of the claims that were not modified by Permit No. 92107-T 19 and which therefore retain their current manner of use, place of use, and point of diversion are not 20 modified by this Order. This modification does not make any changes to the listed owner of the 21 water rights claims, or any portions thereof, as set forth in the Walker River Decree, even though 22 the ownership of the water rights claims has changed since the entry of this Decree. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:73-cv-00003-MMD Document 1921 Filed 02/22/23 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?