United States of America v. Walker River Irrigation

Filing 1092

ORDER APPROVING BUDGET AND RATE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR JULY 1, 2012 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2013, AND THE AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 5/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 14 Plaintiff, 17 In Equity No. C-125 WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE, 15 16 3:73-cv-00125-ECR-WGC ORDER APPROVING BUDGET AND RATE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR JULY 1, 2012 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2013, AND THE AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 Plaintiff-Intervenor, vs. WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a corporation, et al., 18 19 Defendants. _______________________________________/ 20 The Petition of the United States Board of Water Commissioners and the Chief Deputy 21 Water Commissioner for Approval of Budget and Approval of Rate of Assessment for the Year July 1, 22 2012 Through June 30, 2013, and for Approval of the Audit Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2011 23 (“Petition”) (Doc. 1069) was filed on April 12, 2012. The Walker River Paiute Tribe (“Tribe”) and the 24 United States of America (“United States”) filed Joint Comments (Doc. 1087) on May 16, 2012. Subject 25 to the statements made in their Joint Comments, the Tribe and the United States did not object to the 26 Court approving the Petition (Doc. 1069). The Walker River Irrigation District (“District”) filed a 27 Response to the Joint Comments of the Tribe and the United States on May 17, 2012 (Doc. 1088). The 28 1 1 District’s Response did not object to the budget, rate of assessment or the audit report. There were no 2 other comments or objections filed to the budget, rate of assessment or the audit report. 3 4 5 The Court having considered the Petition, the proofs of notice, and being fully advised in the premises makes the following findings: 1. The Court finds that notice of this hearing has been given by publication and 6 posting of the Amended Notice of Filing of Report and Petition for Approval of Budget and Approval 7 of Rate of Assessment for the Year July 1, 2012 Through June 30, 2013, and for Approval of the Audit 8 Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2011 in accordance with its Order of April 20, 2012 (Doc. 1076), 9 and that additional notice has been given by electronic service and by mailing a copy of the Petition, the 10 Order Requiring Notice (Proposed) and Notice of Filing Report (Proposed) on April 12, 2012, as set 11 forth in the Affidavit of Service filed on April 12, 2012 (Doc. 1072). 12 13 14 2. The Court finds that the Budget and Rate of Assessment for the year July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013 should be approved. 3. The Court finds the Audit Report of the accounting records of the United States 15 Board of Water Commissioners for the year ended June 30, 2011, prepared by Arrighi, Rader & Blake 16 LLC, Certified Public Accountants, should be approved. 17 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that: 18 1. The Budget and Rate of Assessment of $2.60 per acre for the year July 1, 2012 19 to June 30, 2013 submitted by the Chief Deputy Water Commissioner and approved by the United States 20 Board of Water Commissioners on March 8, 2012, is hereby approved; and 21 2. The Audit Report of the accounting records of the United States Board of Water 22 Commissioners for the year ended June 30, 2011, prepared by Arrighi, Rader & Blake LLC, Certified 23 Public Accountants, is hereby approved. 24 DATED this _______ day of _________________, 2012. 22nd day of May, 2012. 25 26 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?