United States of America v. Walker River Irrigation

Filing 1719

ORDER Modifying Walker River Decree to Conform with Nevada State Engineer Instream Flow Water Rights Permit No. 90690; re ECF No. 1699 Motion, Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/12/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., IN EQUITY NO.C-125 4 CASE NO.: 3-73-CV-00125-MMD-WGC 5 Plaintiffs, vs. 6 WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 ORDER MODIFYING WALKER RIVER DECREE TO CONFORM WITH NEVADA STATE ENGINEER INSTREAM FLOW WATER RIGHTS PERMIT NO. 90690 9 10 The Walker River Decree is hereby amended in Accordance with Nevada State Engineer 11 instream flow water rights Permit No. 90690. 12 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED 13 that the following water rights under the Walker River Decree, entered herein on April 15, 1936, 14 as modified April 24, 1940, are hereby amended to reflect changes in the manner of use and place 15 of use from irrigation use to instream flow for wildlife purposes in the Walker River and Walker 16 Lake. This modification does not make any changes to the listed owner of the water rights claims, 17 or any portions thereof, as set forth in the Walker River Decree, even though the ownership of the 18 water rights claims has changed since the entry of this Decree. 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Claim 154, Tamagni, Anton and Son, Successors to Pacific Livestock Company, portion changed to instream flows for wildlife purposes, 2 The entirety of water right Claim 154 shall be administered by the Water Master at the point of 3 non-diversion as set forth in Permit No. 90690 when in priority, as shown in the second column (year of priority) and third column (amount at point of non-diversion) of the table below. 4 Thereafter, the Water Master shall administer and protect from diversion by others at and downstream of the point of non-diversion the consumptive use portion, being 3.10 acre-feet per 5 acre, which has been converted to flow measured in cubic feet per second as shown in the fourth column (amount of consumptive use). At the Wabuska Gage, said changed water right shall be 6 administered in the Walker River and Weber Reservoir through the Walker River Paiute Tribe reservation pursuant to the Lower Walker River Conveyance Protocols, all as more fully set forth 7 in Nevada State Engineer Ruling No. 6271, the 2018 Ninth Circuit Decision, and the terms of Permit No. 90690. The non-consumptive use portion of the water rights shall be administered by 8 the Water Master in her or his discretion pursuant to the Walker River Decree and the 1953 Rules and Regulations for the Distribution of Water on the Walker River Stream System, including to 9 avoid conflict with and injury to existing water rights at and downstream of the point of nondiversion and to mitigate hydrologic system losses, from the point of non-diversion to the point or 10 points where the non-consumptive use portion historically returned to the Walker River upstream of the Wabuska Gage. 11 12 13 Stream 14 Walker River 15 16 17 18 Year of Relative Priority Amount at Point of NonDiversion (in c.f.s. ) Amount of Consumptive Use (in c.f.s.) No. of Acres Formerly Irrigated 1864 1865 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890 1895 1900 1905 0.458 0.183 0.697 1.430 1.921 1.220 0.854 0.568 1.100 1.467 0.242 0.096 0.370 0.759 1.021 0.651 0.453 0.300 0.587 0.778 38 15 58 119 160 102 71 47 92 122 Description of Place of Use Walker River from the Point of NonDiversion, through USGS Wabuska Gage, then through Weber Reservoir into and including Walker Lake. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// /// /// /// /// IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/12/2022 27 28 District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?