United States of America v. Walker River Irrigation
Filing
1745
ORDER TEMPORARILY MODIFYING WALKER RIVER DECREE RE PERMIT NO. 90920-T as detailed herein - Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/30/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
4
Plaintiff,
5
WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE,
Plaintiff - Intervenor.
6
7
8
9
10
11
v.
IN EQUITY NO. C-125
CASE NO: 3:73-CV-00125-MMD-CSD
ORDER TEMPORARILY
MODIFYING WALKER RIVER
DECREE RE PERMIT NO. 90920-T
WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION
DISTRICT, a corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
The Walker River Decree is hereby temporarily modified in accordance with Permit
12
No. 90920-T issued by the Nevada State Engineer on February 24, 2022.
13
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that,
14
as set forth in Nevada State Engineer Permit No. 90920-T, the Walker River Decree is
15
hereby modified to reflect the temporary changes in the manner of use and place of use to
16
instream flow for wildlife purposes in the Walker River and Walker Lake of Decreed water
17
right Claim Nos. 41 and 229. This modification does not make any changes to the listed
18
owner of the water rights claims, or any portions thereof, as set forth in the Walker River
19
Decree, even though the ownership of the water rights claims has changed since the entry
20
of this Decree.
21
22
Claim 41/229, Fallon, Ira, Successor to Mrs. Sarah Jane Rallens, et al., portion
changed to instream flows for wildlife purposes.
23
As set forth in Permit No. 90920-T, the portion of water right Claim 41/229 in the
24
table below shall be administered by the Water Master when in priority as shown in the
25
second column (year of priority) and third column (amount at point of non-diversion) of the
26
table. Thereafter, the Water Master shall administer and protect from diversion by others
27
at and downstream of the point of non-diversion the consumptive use portion, being 3.10
28
acre-feet per acre, which has been converted to flow measured in cubic feet per second as
1
1
shown in the fourth column (amount of consumptive use). At the Wabuska Gage, said
2
changed water right shall be administered in the Walker River and Weber Reservoir
3
through the Walker River Paiute Tribe reservation pursuant to the Lower Walker River
4
Conveyance Protocols, all as more fully set forth in Nevada State Engineer Ruling No. 6271,
5
the 2018 Ninth Circuit Decision and the terms of Permit No. 80700. The non-consumptive
6
use portion of the water rights shall be administered by the Water Master in her or his
7
discretion pursuant to the Walker River Decree and the 1953 Rules and Regulations for
8
the Distribution of Water on the Walker River Stream System, including to avoid conflict
9
with and injury to existing water rights at and downstream of the point of non-diversion
10
and to mitigate hydrologic system losses, from the point of non-diversion to the point or
11
points where the non-consumptive use portion historically returned to the Walker River
12
upstream of the Wabuska Gage.
13
14
15
16
17
Stream
Year of
Relative
Priority
Amount at
Point of
NonDiversion
(in c.f.s. )
Amount of
Consumptive
Use
(in c.f.s.)
No. of
Acres
Formerly
Irrigated
Description of Place of Use
Walker River from the Point of Non-Diversion,
Walker
1874
6.410
1.462
229.17
through USGS Wabuska Gage, then through
River
1880
1.540
0.819
128.35
Weber Reservoir into and including Walker Lake.
18
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED
20
That Permit No. 90920-T shall be administered in exactly the same fashion as the
21
Walker Basin Conservancy’s previously approved Permit Nos. 80700 and 88160–88162
22
using the Wabuska and Yerington Weir Gages and no special fees or costs may be assessed
23
against NDOW for its administration.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
30thday of
DATED this ____
September
2022.
26
27
28
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?