IN EQUITY C-125-B: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION, ET AL.

Filing 2608

ORDER - ECF No. 2607 Stipulation is granted. Responses to the Joint Motion (ECF No. 2606 ) will be due within 90 days of its service and replies to responses will be due within 45 days of service of the responses.The Co urt will not approve any future request to further extend the briefing schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 2/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed through electronic service only - AB) (Walker River Water Case Display Page)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GORDON H. DePAOLI Nevada State Bar No. 00195 DALE E. FERGUSON Nevada State Bar No. 4986 DOMENICO R. DePAOLI Nevada State Bar No. 11553 WOODBURN AND WEDGE 6100 Neil Road, Suite 500 Reno, Nevada 89511 Telephone: 775 / 688-3000 Attorneys for WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE, ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) v. ) ) WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ) a corporation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 3:73-cv-00127-MMD-WGC STIPULATION AND ORDER CONFIRMING SCHEDULE AND RELATED MATTERS FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES WITH RESPECT TO JOINT MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 20 1. On February 19, 2020, a Status Conference was held in this matter before the 21 Honorable William G. Cobb, U.S. Magistrate Judge, concerning the Proposed Scheduling 22 23 24 Order and Discovery Plan (ECF 2598). 2. As a result of that Status Conference, the parties agreed to revise the Proposed 25 Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan pursuant to the discussion with and instructions from the 26 Court. See Minutes of Proceedings, ECF 2605. 27 3. The parties have been directed to file a revised Proposed Scheduling Order and 28 Discovery Plan by March 13, 2020. -1- 1 2 4. On February 20, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Joint Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF 2606) (the “Joint Motion”). 3 5. During the Status Conference, Plaintiffs stated that they would be filing the Joint 4 Motion, and it was agreed that the schedule for responses and replies to the Joint Motion would 5 6 be as the parties had agreed in the not yet final Proposed Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan. 6. 7 In addition, the parties were in substantial agreement on the provisions to be 8 included in the Proposed Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan concerning coordination, to the 9 extent feasible, with respect to the filing of motions, the grounds for motions, briefs supporting 10 motions, and page limits with respect to briefs concerning motions. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 12 1. The party groups (i.e., Plaintiffs and Principal Defendants) will coordinate their 13 14 15 respective responsive and reply briefs with respect to the Joint Motion, and will do their best to file joint responses or replies. 2. 16 Plaintiffs and Principal Defendants potentially have common issues to brief. To 17 the extent feasible, the party groups (i.e., Plaintiffs and Principal Defendants) shall separately 18 work as a group to file a single brief on a common issue. No page limit will be imposed on a 19 response or reply to the extent that multiple common issues are incorporated into a single brief. 20 3. If a response or reply is filed by individual parties rather than as a group, the 21 22 Local Rules of the Court concerning page limitations shall apply. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 -2- 1 2 4. Responses to the Joint Motion will be due within 90 days of its service, and replies to responses will be due within 45 days of service of the responses. 3 Dated: February 26, 2020. 4 WOODBURN AND WEDGE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By: By: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 / s / Gordon H. DePaoli Gordon H. DePaoli Nevada Bar No. 195 6100 Neil Road, Suite 500 Reno, Nevada 89511 Attorneys for Walker River Irrigation District 12 LAW OFFICES OF WES WILLIAMS, JR., P.C. 13 By: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 / s / Wes Williams, Jr. (per authorization) Wes Williams, Jr., NSB 6864 3119 Pasture Rd. P.O. Box 100 Schurz, Nevada 89427 MEYER, WALKER, CONDON & WALKER, P.C. Alice E. Walker 1007 Pearl Street Boulder, Colorado 80302 Attorneys for Walker River Paiute Tribe 21 22 23 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA 24 By: 25 26 27 28 / s / Tyler J. Eastman (per authorization) A. Guss Guarino, Trial Attorney Tyler J. Eastman, Trial Attorney Environment and Natural Resources Div. 999 18th Street, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado 80202 David L. Negri Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office 800 Park Boulevard, Suite 600 Boise, Idaho 83712 Attorneys for United States of America ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT By: /s/ Simeon Herskovits (per authorization) Simeon Herskovits, NSB 11155 Iris Thornton P.O. Box 1075 El Prado, New Mexico 87529 Attorneys for Mineral County BEST BEST & KRIEGER By: / s / Nhu Q. Nguyen (per authorization) Nhu Q. Nguyen, NSB 7844 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, California 94244-2550 Attorneys for California State Agencies / s / Roderick E. Walston (per authorization) Roderick E. Walston 2001 N. Main Street, Suite 390 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Jerry Snyder, NSB 6830 429 W. Plumb Lane Reno, Nevada 89509 Attorneys for Lyon County -3- 1 3 4 5 6 7 STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE COUNTY OF MONO (CA) By: / s / Anthony J. Walsh (per authorization) Anthony J. Walsh, NSB 14128 Deputy Attorney General 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Attorneys for Nevada Department of Wildlife By: SCHROEDER LAW OFFICES, P.C. 2 SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC By: By: / s / Jason Canger (per authorization) Stacey Simon, County Counsel Jason Canger, Dep. County Counsel P.O. Box 2415A Mammoth Lakes, California 93546-2415 Attorneys for Mono County 8 9 10 11 12 / s / Therese A. Ure (per authorization) Therese A. Ure, NSB 10255 10615 Double R Boulevard, Suite 100 Reno, Nevada 89521 Attorneys for The Schroeder Group 13 14 / s / Brad M. Johnston (per authorization) Brad M. Johnston, NSB 8515 22 State Route 208 Yerington, Nevada 89447 Attorneys for Desert Pearl Farms, Peri Family Ranch, LLC, Peri & Peri LLC, and Frade Ranches 15 16 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 -4- 1 ORDER 2 While the court approves of the briefing schedule regarding the “Joint Motion” (⁋ 4, ECF 3 No. 2607 at p. 3), due to the extended time provided in the briefing schedule, the court will not 4 approve any future request to further extend the briefing schedule. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 27, 2020 DATED: February 6, 2020. 8 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?