Johnson v. Hatcher et al
ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to ECF No. 62 Notice of Appeal : The motion for reconsideration is denied, and the motion for reconsideration en banc is denied. Motion for counsel is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. USCA Case 17-16747. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 29 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
TIMOTHY H. JOHNSON,
SHERMAN HATCHER and ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
D.C. No. 3:92-cv-00372-MMD
District of Nevada,
LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant has filed a combined motion for reconsideration and motion for
reconsideration en banc (Docket Entry No. 5).
The motion for reconsideration is denied, and the motion for reconsideration
en banc is denied on behalf of the court. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10; 9th Cir. Gen. Ord.
Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. 4) is
denied as moot.
No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?