FERNANDO PADRON RODRIGUEZ V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.
Filing
83
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall transmit the Motion for Substitution of Respondent 82 to the Court of Appeals for its consideration. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 11/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 11/4/2011 to reflect that a copy of this Order was electronically sent to USCA. (MLC).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
FERNANDO PADRON RODRIGUEZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
vs.
14
E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.,
15
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:02-cv-00236-ECR-VPC
ORDER
16
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which
17
petitioner, a state prisoner, is proceeding with counsel. The matter is currently on appeal at the Ninth
18
Circuit Court of Appeals as case number 09-17171. On October 31, 2011, respondents filed a motion
19
for substitution of respondents (ECF No. 82) indicating that Renee Baker was the proper respondent.
20
Because this Court lost jurisdiction over the matter upon the docketing of the appeal, this
21
motion shall be transferred to the Court of Appeals for its consideration. Mayweathers v. Newland 258
22
F.3d 930, 935 (9th Cir. 2001) citing Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S.
23
373, 379, 105 S.Ct. 1327, 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985) (“In general, filing of a notice of appeal confers
24
jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of control over those aspects of the case
25
involved in the appeal.”).
26
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall transmit the Motion for
Substitution of Respondent (ECF No. 82) to the Court of Appeals for its consideration.
3
4
DATED this 3rd day of November, 2011.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?