MARK ROGERS V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.
Filing
262
ORDER that the petitioner's "Emergency Motion to Expedite Resolution of Motion for Order Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison" (ECF No. 258 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until 1:00 p.m. on October 11, 2018, to respond to the Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison. Thereafter, Rogers will have until 10:00 a.m. on October 12, 2018, to file a reply, if necessary. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
10
11
MARK ROGERS,
Case No. 3:02-cv-00342-GMN-WGC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
12
13
WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
16
In this habeas corpus action, the Court has granted the petitioner, Mark Rogers,
17
an evidentiary hearing with respect to Ground 5 of Rogers’ second amended habeas
18
petition. See Order entered November 6, 2017 (ECF No. 215); Order entered November
19
28, 2017 (ECF No. 217). The evidentiary hearing will commence on October 22, 2018.
20
See Order entered March 14, 2018 (ECF No. 222).
21
Rogers will appear at the evidentiary hearing from Ely State Prison (ESP) by video.
22
See Order entered September 11, 2018 (ECF No. 251). The Court has directed the
23
respondents “to make arrangements at the prison where the petitioner is incarcerated to
24
have the petitioner appear by video at the evidentiary hearing.” See id. at 2. As it is unclear
25
whether anything has been done in this regard to date, the Court will further order the
26
respondents to have ESP personnel contact Court personnel by October 12, 2018, to
27
inform the Court of the status of those arrangements and to further coordinate the
28
arrangements.
1
1
Rogers’ counsel has represented that one of Rogers’ attorneys will be present with
2
Rogers, at ESP, during the evidentiary hearing, to consult with him. See Notice filed
3
September 18, 2018 (ECF No. 253).
4
On October 9, 2018, Rogers filed a “Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison”
5
(ECF No. 259). In that motion, Rogers requests that the Court order the respondents to
6
allow his counsel to possess a mobile phone at ESP during the evidentiary hearing, and
7
to use it to communicate with co-counsel in the courtroom by text messaging. Rogers
8
argues that this would be the most efficient method of communication between Rogers’
9
counsel at the prison and his counsel in the courtroom. Rogers’ counsel represent that
10
they have requested permission from prison personnel for such use of a mobile phone at
11
ESP during the evidentiary hearing, but the request was denied.
12
On October 9, 2018, Rogers also filed an “Emergency Motion to Expedite
13
Resolution of Motion for Order Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison” (ECF No. 258),
14
requesting that the Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison be expedited, and resolved
15
no later than October 16, 2018. The Court will grant this motion and will set an expedited
16
briefing schedule.
17
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondents are directed to have
18
appropriate ESP personnel contact Court personnel to inform the Court of the status of
19
the arrangements for Rogers’ appearance by video at the evidentiary hearing, and to
20
further coordinate those arrangements. Respondents are to have ESP personnel contact
21
Aaron Blazevitch (aaron_blazevitch@nvd.uscourts.gov), regarding this matter, no later
22
than October 12, 2018, at 4:00 p.m.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s “Emergency Motion to Expedite
2
Resolution of Motion for Order Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison” (ECF No. 258) is
3
GRANTED. Respondents will have until 1:00 p.m. on October 11, 2018, to respond to
4
the Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison. Thereafter, Rogers will have until 10:00
5
a.m. on October 12, 2018, to file a reply, if necessary.
6
7
10
October
DATED THIS ___ day of ______________________, 2018.
8
9
10
GLORIA M. NAVARRO,
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?