MARK ROGERS V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.

Filing 262

ORDER that the petitioner's "Emergency Motion to Expedite Resolution of Motion for Order Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison" (ECF No. 258 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until 1:00 p.m. on October 11, 2018, to respond to the Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison. Thereafter, Rogers will have until 10:00 a.m. on October 12, 2018, to file a reply, if necessary. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 10 11 MARK ROGERS, Case No. 3:02-cv-00342-GMN-WGC Petitioner, ORDER v. 12 13 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 14 15 16 In this habeas corpus action, the Court has granted the petitioner, Mark Rogers, 17 an evidentiary hearing with respect to Ground 5 of Rogers’ second amended habeas 18 petition. See Order entered November 6, 2017 (ECF No. 215); Order entered November 19 28, 2017 (ECF No. 217). The evidentiary hearing will commence on October 22, 2018. 20 See Order entered March 14, 2018 (ECF No. 222). 21 Rogers will appear at the evidentiary hearing from Ely State Prison (ESP) by video. 22 See Order entered September 11, 2018 (ECF No. 251). The Court has directed the 23 respondents “to make arrangements at the prison where the petitioner is incarcerated to 24 have the petitioner appear by video at the evidentiary hearing.” See id. at 2. As it is unclear 25 whether anything has been done in this regard to date, the Court will further order the 26 respondents to have ESP personnel contact Court personnel by October 12, 2018, to 27 inform the Court of the status of those arrangements and to further coordinate the 28 arrangements. 1 1 Rogers’ counsel has represented that one of Rogers’ attorneys will be present with 2 Rogers, at ESP, during the evidentiary hearing, to consult with him. See Notice filed 3 September 18, 2018 (ECF No. 253). 4 On October 9, 2018, Rogers filed a “Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison” 5 (ECF No. 259). In that motion, Rogers requests that the Court order the respondents to 6 allow his counsel to possess a mobile phone at ESP during the evidentiary hearing, and 7 to use it to communicate with co-counsel in the courtroom by text messaging. Rogers 8 argues that this would be the most efficient method of communication between Rogers’ 9 counsel at the prison and his counsel in the courtroom. Rogers’ counsel represent that 10 they have requested permission from prison personnel for such use of a mobile phone at 11 ESP during the evidentiary hearing, but the request was denied. 12 On October 9, 2018, Rogers also filed an “Emergency Motion to Expedite 13 Resolution of Motion for Order Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison” (ECF No. 258), 14 requesting that the Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison be expedited, and resolved 15 no later than October 16, 2018. The Court will grant this motion and will set an expedited 16 briefing schedule. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondents are directed to have 18 appropriate ESP personnel contact Court personnel to inform the Court of the status of 19 the arrangements for Rogers’ appearance by video at the evidentiary hearing, and to 20 further coordinate those arrangements. Respondents are to have ESP personnel contact 21 Aaron Blazevitch (aaron_blazevitch@nvd.uscourts.gov), regarding this matter, no later 22 than October 12, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s “Emergency Motion to Expedite 2 Resolution of Motion for Order Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison” (ECF No. 258) is 3 GRANTED. Respondents will have until 1:00 p.m. on October 11, 2018, to respond to 4 the Motion Permitting Mobile Phone at Prison. Thereafter, Rogers will have until 10:00 5 a.m. on October 12, 2018, to file a reply, if necessary. 6 7 10 October DATED THIS ___ day of ______________________, 2018. 8 9 10 GLORIA M. NAVARRO, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?