MARK ROGERS V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.

Filing 280

ORDER that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 279 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including January 29, 2019, to file their post-hearing brief. Petitioner will then have 14 days to file a reply. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 MARK ROGERS, 7 Petitioner, 8 v. Case No. 3:02-cv-00342-GMN-WGC ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF 9 10 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 11 12 13 In this habeas corpus action, the Court held an evidentiary hearing from 14 October 22 to 24, 2018. Following the evidentiary hearing, the petitioner, Mark Rogers, 15 filed his post-hearing brief on December 21, 2018 (ECF No. 278). Respondents were 16 then due to file their post-hearing brief by January 22, 2019. See Minutes of 17 Proceedings, October 24, 2018 (ECF No. 272). 18 On January 22, 2019, Respondents filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF 19 No. 279), requesting a seven-day extension of time, to January 29, 2019, for their post- 20 hearing brief. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary 21 because of time away from her office. Rogers’ counsel does not oppose the extension 22 of time. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and 23 not solely for the purpose of delay and that there is good cause for the requested 24 extension of time. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement 2 of Time (ECF No. 279) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including 3 January 29, 2019, to file their post-hearing brief. Petitioner will then have 14 days to file 4 a reply. 5 6 23 January DATED THIS ___ day of ______________________, 2019. 7 8 9 GLORIA M. NAVARRO, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?