MARK ROGERS V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.
Filing
280
ORDER that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 279 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including January 29, 2019, to file their post-hearing brief. Petitioner will then have 14 days to file a reply. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
MARK ROGERS,
7
Petitioner,
8
v.
Case No. 3:02-cv-00342-GMN-WGC
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF
9
10
WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.
11
12
13
In this habeas corpus action, the Court held an evidentiary hearing from
14
October 22 to 24, 2018. Following the evidentiary hearing, the petitioner, Mark Rogers,
15
filed his post-hearing brief on December 21, 2018 (ECF No. 278). Respondents were
16
then due to file their post-hearing brief by January 22, 2019. See Minutes of
17
Proceedings, October 24, 2018 (ECF No. 272).
18
On January 22, 2019, Respondents filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF
19
No. 279), requesting a seven-day extension of time, to January 29, 2019, for their post-
20
hearing brief. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary
21
because of time away from her office. Rogers’ counsel does not oppose the extension
22
of time. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and
23
not solely for the purpose of delay and that there is good cause for the requested
24
extension of time.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement
2
of Time (ECF No. 279) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including
3
January 29, 2019, to file their post-hearing brief. Petitioner will then have 14 days to file
4
a reply.
5
6
23
January
DATED THIS ___ day of ______________________, 2019.
7
8
9
GLORIA M. NAVARRO,
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?