MARK ROGERS V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.

Filing 283

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENTS' BRIEF. Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time ECF No. 281 is GRANTED; Respondents' brief ECF No. 282 will be treated as timely filed. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5
6

MARK ROGERS,

7

Petitioner,

8

v.

Case No. 3:02-cv-00342-GMN-WGC
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF

9
10

WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.

11
12
13

In this habeas corpus action, the Court held an evidentiary hearing from

14

October 22 to 24, 2018. Following the evidentiary hearing, the petitioner, Mark Rogers,

15

filed his post-hearing brief on December 21, 2018 (ECF No. 278). Respondents were

16

then due to file their post-hearing brief by January 29, 2019. See Minutes of

17

Proceedings, October 24, 2018 (ECF No. 272); Order entered January 23, 2019

18

(ECF No. 280).

19

On January 29, 2019, Respondents filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time

20

(ECF No. 281), requesting a one-day extension of time, to January 29, 2019, for their

21

post-hearing brief. Respondents then filed their post-hearing brief on January 30, 2019

22

(ECF No. 282) as contemplated in the motion for extension of time. Respondents’

23

counsel states that the extension of time was necessary because of time away from her

24

office. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and

25

not solely for the purpose of delay and that there is good cause for the requested

26

extension of time.

27

///

28

///
1

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement

2

of Time (ECF No. 281) is GRANTED. Respondents’ brief (ECF No. 282) will be treated

3

as timely filed.

4
5

31
January
DATED THIS ___ day of ______________________, 2019.

6
7
8

GLORIA M. NAVARRO,
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2