SHAWN VAN ASDALE, et al vs INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
Filing
357
AMENDED JUDGMENT. JUDGMENT: the plaintiff, Shawn Van Asdale, recover from the defendant, International Game Technology, $955,597.00, in actual damages; the plaintiff, Lena Van Asdale, recover from the defendant, International Game Technology, & #036;1,270,303.00, in actual damages.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Prejudgment Interest (Doc. #323-327) is GRANTED. The total amount of attorneys' fees awarded is $1,009,620.00. The total amount of costs awarded is $131,953.94. The total amount of prejudgment interest awarded is $1,275,766.50 ($552,418.62 to Shawn Van Asdale and $723,347.90 to Lena Van Asdale). Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 5/27/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
AO 450 Judgment in a Civil Case
r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
*****
DISTRICT OF
NEVADA
SHAWN VAN ASDALE and
LENA VAN ASDALE,
AMENDED
Plaintiffs,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
V.
CASE NUMBER: 3:04-cv-00703-RAM
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,
Defendant.
X
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury with Robert A. McQuaid, Jr.,
United States Magistrate Judge presiding. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered
its verdict.
JUDGMENT: the plaintiff, Shawn Van Asdale, recover from the defendant, International Game
Technology, $955,597.00, in actual damages; the plaintiff, Lena Van Asdale, recover from the
defendant, International Game Technology, $1,270,303.00, in actual damages.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and
Prejudgment Interest (Doc. #323-327) is GRANTED. The total amount of attorneys' fees awarded is
$1,009,620.00. The total amount of costs awarded is $131,953.94. The total amount of prejudgment
interest awarded is $1,275,766.50 ($552,418.62 to Shawn Van Asdale and $723,347.90 to Lena Van
Asdale).
May 27, 2011
LANCE S. WILSON
Clerk
/s/ Katie Lynn Ogden
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?