JUAN M. CASTILLO VS E.K. MCDANIEL, et al
Filing
72
ORDER - Answer to # 64 Successor Petition due by 8/8/2015; Reply due 45 days from serive of answer. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 6/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
JUAN M. CASTILLO,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
Case No. 3:05-cv-00366-RLH-RAM
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
13
ORDER
Respondents.
14
15
Petitioner has filed a successor petition for writ of habeas corpus (#64), having received
16
authorization from the court of appeals. The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules
17
Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court will direct
18
respondents to file a response.
19
The court of appeals authorized this successive petition for petitioner to argue that Miller v.
20
Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012) is retroactive and applicable to his sentence. Miller held
21
unconstitutional a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for a
22
person under the age of 18 at the time of the commission of the crime. The court notes that two
23
weeks after petitioner filed the successor petition (#64), the Supreme Court of the United States has
24
granted a petition for a writ of certiorari on the question whether Miller has retroactive effect, in
25
Montgomery v. Louisiana, No. 14-280.
26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the
27
date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the successor petition (#64).
28
Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading,
1
including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be
2
entertained. If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the
3
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall
4
have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.
5
DATED: June 24, 2015.
6
7
_________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?