Montgomery et al v. eTreppid Technologies et al

Filing 1175

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Government shall conduct a further review of the materials for purposes of making any necessary redactions to comply with the Protective Ordder 253 previously entered and thereafter shall return the redacted documents to the Court for retention.+ Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/17/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
Montgomery et al v. eTreppid Technologies et al Doc. 1175 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 _______________________________ PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D IS T R IC T OF NEVADA *** ) D E N N IS MONTGOMERY and the ) M O N T G O M E R Y FAMILY TRUST, ) ) P la in tif f s , ) ) v. ) ) E T R E P P ID TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ) W A R R E N TREPP; and the UNITED ) S T A T E S DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) AND ALL RELATED MATTERS. ) ) 3 :0 6 -C V -0 0 0 5 6 -P M P -V P C B A S E FILE 3 :0 6 -C V -0 0 1 4 5 -P M P -V P C ORDER T h e Government having briefly reviewed in camera the documents this Court re c e iv e d from the Honorable Ralph B. Kirscher, United States Bankruptcy Court Judge for th e District of Montana, documents filed in a case pending before Judge Kirscher, In re E d ra Blixseth, Case No. 09-60452-7, IT IS ORDERED that the Government shall conduct a further review of the m a te ria ls for purposes of making any necessary redactions to comply with the Protective O rd e r (Doc. #253) previously entered in this case and thereafter shall return the redacted d o c u m e n ts to the Court for retention. DATED: November 17, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?