Deeds v. Benedetti, et al.

Filing 86

ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING 85 Report and Recommendation. The 80 settlement agreement is RATIFIED as a binding settlement agreement and Ds are ordered to perform as agreed in the 80 settlement agreement. P's 82 Motion to strike fugitive document is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/5/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#85) entered on April 6, 2009, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends entering an order enforcing the corrected settlement agreement (#80) and dismissing the case with prejudice. No objections were filed. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby /// /// /// /// /// v. JIM BENEDETTI, et al., Defendants. RICHARD DEEDS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:06-cv-00282-LRH (VPC) ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#85) as follows: The settlement agreement (#80) is RATIFIED as a binding settlement agreement and defendants are ordered to perform as agreed in the settlement agreement (#80). Plaintiff's motion to strike fugitive agreement (#82) is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 5th day of May, 2009. _______________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?