Orth v. Balaam et al

Filing 37

ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action will be dismissed without further advance notice for failure to timely effect service unless, within 30 days of entry of this order, Plain tiff mails for filing either: (a) proof of service of the first amended complaint; or (b) a proper motion for leave to file a second amended complaint with a completed pleading. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/31/08. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

Orth v. Balaam et al

Doc. 37

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SEAN RODNEY ORTH, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 ORDER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This prisoner civil rights action comes before the Court on plaintiff's motion (#36) for leave to file a second amended complaint. No pleading was attached with the motion. Under Local Rule LR 15-1, "[u]nless otherwise permitted by the court, the moving party shall attach the proposed amended pleading to any motion to amend so that it will be complete in itself without reference to the superceding pleading." Plaintiff did not attach a proposed amended pleading with the motion for leave to amend, and the motion therefore will be denied for failure to comply with the Local Rules. Contrary to the plaintiff's assertions in the present motion, his motion (#26) to extend order did not constitute a motion for leave to amend, and the motion did not request such relief. Further contrary to the plaintiff's assertions in the present motion, the prior second amended complaint was stricken, not dismissed. Plaintiff requests thirty days within which to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has been under no deadline within which to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff's prior second DENNIS BALAAM, et al. Defendants. 3:06-cv-00481-LRH-RAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

amended complaint was stricken two months ago, and plaintiff has had ample time to file a motion for leave to amend accompanied by a completed pleading. However, out of an abundance of caution, the Court will extend the time for service of the first amended complaint for thirty days. The action will be dismissed without further advance notice for failure to timely effect service unless, within thirty days of entry of this order, plaintiff mails for filing either: (a) proof of service of the first amended complaint; or (b) a proper motion for leave to file a second amended complaint with a completed pleading. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the motion (#36) for leave to file a second amended complaint is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that this action will be dismissed without further advance notice for failure to timely effect service unless, within thirty days of entry of this order, plaintiff mails for filing either: (a) proof of service of the first amended complaint; or (b) a proper motion for leave to file a second amended complaint with a completed pleading. DATED this 31st day of January, 2008.

___________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-