William England v. State Of Nevada et al

Filing 165

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 9/14/2010 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Jennifer Cotter; Pla Counsel: William England, In Pro Per (telephonically); Def Counsel: Clark Leslie (te lephonically); FTR #: 11:16:11 a.m. - 11:22:10 a.m.; Courtroom: 2. IT IS ORDERED that 158 Motion for Order for Plaintiff to Correspond with Witnesses and 159 Motion to Enlarge Copy Limit are GRANTED to the extent as shown in attached minutes. Please see attached minutes for details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
William England v. State Of Nevada et al Doc. 165 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA WILLIAM ENGLAND, Plaintiff(s), vs. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:06-CV-0576-RAM MINUTES OF THE COURT DATED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 PRESENT: HONORABLE ROBERT A. McQUAID, JR., U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Deputy Clerk: JENNIFER COTTER FTR: 11:16:11 a.m. - 11:22:10 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff(s): WILLIAM ENGLAND, In Pro Per (telephonically) Counsel for Defendant(s): CLARK LESLIE (telephonically) PROCEEDINGS: MOTION HEARING 11:16 a.m. Court convenes. The Court addresses the subject motions. Motion to Enlarge Copy Limit (Docket #159) IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Enlarge Copy Limit is GRANTED. Plaintiff's copy limit shall be increased an additional $50.00. Motion for Order for Plaintiff to Correspond with Witnesses (Docket #158) IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Order for Plaintiff to Correspond with Witnesses is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall be allowed to correspond with his incarcerated witnesses provided he fill out a "Correspondence Request Form". IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be allowed to correspond with Mr. Juan High and that Mr. High's parole officer shall cooperate with Plaintiff in this regard. 11:22 a.m. Court adjourns. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?