Kevin Fernandez Vs. State of Nevada, et al.

Filing 622

ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING the 591 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 552 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Limited Discovery is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/20/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 ***** ) KEVIN FERNANDEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-WGC ) v. ) ) ORDER STATE OF NEVADA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) 14 15 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. 16 Cobb (#5911) entered on February 9, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Evidentiary 17 Hearing and Limited Discovery (#552) filed on August 23, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff filed his 18 Objections to the Report and Recommendation (#611) on March 5, 2012. Defendants have not filed 19 a response to the objections. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties 20 and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the 21 requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 1B 3-1(a) of the Rules of Practice of the 22 United States District Court for the District of Nevada. 23 It appearing to the Court that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is neither 24 erroneous nor contrary to law, and good cause appearing, the Court determines that the Magistrate 25 26 1 Refers to court’s docket number. 1 Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#591) entered on February 9, 2012, is ADOPTED and 2 ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Limited Discovery (#552) is 3 DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED this 20th day of March, 2012. 7 8 9 10 _______________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?